Hrm Congruence Proofs. Don't remember the rules

In summary, the conversation is about proving that for all n, 8^n = 1 (mod 7) using induction. The work presented is mostly sound, but could use some cleaning up and consistency in notation.
  • #1
1MileCrash
1,342
41
Hrm... Congruence Proofs. Don't remember the "rules"

Homework Statement



Take equals sign as congruence or equals based on context, please. Itex does not work in Opera.

Prove that for all n, 8^n = 1 (mod 7)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This will be a proof by induction.

Consider the case where n = 1.

Since 8^1 = 8, and 8 - 1 = 7, which is divisible by 7, we see that 8 = 1 (mod 7).

Now, assume that this theorem holds for some k in the natural numbers.

Then,

8^k = [1]

(8)8^k = [8][1]
8^(k+1) = [1][1] (since we know that 8 = 1(mod 7))
8^(k+1) = [1]

Thus, 8^k+1 = 1 (mod 7)

Therefore, the theorem holds for all n.


Been a while... sorry if it's really terrible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


1MileCrash said:

Homework Statement



Take equals sign as congruence or equals based on context, please. Itex does not work in Opera.

Prove that for all n, 8^n = 1 (mod 7)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This will be a proof by induction.

Consider the case where n = 1.

Since 8^1 = 8, and 8 - 1 = 7, which is divisible by 7, we see that 8 = 1 (mod 7).

Now, assume that this theorem holds for some k in the natural numbers.

Then,

8^k = [1]

(8)8^k = [8][1]
8^(k+1) = [1][1] (since we know that 8 = 1(mod 7))
8^(k+1) = [1]

Thus, 8^k+1 = 1 (mod 7)

Therefore, the theorem holds for all n.


Been a while... sorry if it's really terrible.

Your logic is sound, but the work could be cleaned up in places. For example, you switch from 1 (mod 7) near the beginning to the [1] equivalence class. It would be better if you were consistent.

Also, what you wrote as 8^k+1 needs to be written as 8^(k + 1). This seems to have been a momentary lapse, as you wrote it correctly in the preceding work.

You might already know this, but 8^k+1 would be interpreted to mean 8k + 1, which isn't what you want.
 

FAQ: Hrm Congruence Proofs. Don't remember the rules

What is an Hrm Congruence Proof?

An Hrm Congruence Proof is a type of mathematical proof used to show that two shapes or objects are congruent, meaning they have the same size and shape.

What are the rules for Hrm Congruence Proofs?

The rules for Hrm Congruence Proofs vary depending on the specific type of proof being used. However, some general rules include using corresponding parts of congruent triangles, using the ASA (angle-side-angle), SAS (side-angle-side), SSS (side-side-side), or AAS (angle-angle-side) congruence postulates, and using the reflexive, symmetric, and transitive properties of equality.

How do I remember the rules for Hrm Congruence Proofs?

The best way to remember the rules for Hrm Congruence Proofs is through practice and repetition. It may also be helpful to create flashcards or mnemonic devices to help you remember the different rules.

What are some common mistakes to avoid in Hrm Congruence Proofs?

Some common mistakes to avoid in Hrm Congruence Proofs include assuming that corresponding sides or angles are congruent without justification, using incorrect congruence postulates, and using incorrect properties of equality.

Can I use Hrm Congruence Proofs for non-triangular shapes?

Yes, Hrm Congruence Proofs can be used for non-triangular shapes as long as the shapes have corresponding parts that can be matched up and proven to be congruent. However, the specific rules and postulates used may differ from those used in triangular proofs.

Back
Top