- #1
justinbaker
- 34
- 0
The Sun emits energy at a rate of about 3.9 · 1026W. At Earth, this sunshine gives
an incident energy flux Ie of about 1.4kWm−2. In this problem, you’ll investigate
whether any other planets in our solar systemcould support the sort of water-based
life we find on Earth.
Consider a planet orbiting at distance d from the Sun (and let de be Earth’s distance).
The Sun’s energy flux at distance d is I = Ie(de/d)2, because energy flux decreases
as the inverse square of distance. Call the planet’s radius R, and suppose that
it absorbs a fraction α of the incident sunlight, reflecting the rest back into space. The
planet intercepts a disk of sunlight of area πR2, so it absorbs a total power of πR2αI.
Earth’s radius is about 6400 km.
The Sun has been shining for a long time, but Earth’s temperature is roughly
stable: The planet is in a steady state. For this to happen, the absorbed solar energy
must get reradiated back to space as fast as it arrives (see Figure 1.2). Because the rate
at which a body radiates heat depends on its temperature, we can find the expected
mean temperature of the planet, using the formula
radiated heat flux = ασT4.
In this formula, σ denotes the number 5.7·10−8Wm−2 K−4 (the “Stefan–Boltzmann
constant”). The formula gives the rate of energy loss per unit area of the radiating
body (here, the Earth). You needn’t understand the derivation of this formula but
make sure you do understand how the units work.
a. Using this formula, work out the average temperature at the Earth’s surface and
compare your answer to the actual value of 289K.
b. Using the formula, work out how far from the Sun a planet the size of Earth may
be, as a multiple of de, and still have a mean temperature greater than freezing.
c. Using the formula, work out how close to the Sun a planet the size of Earth may
be, as a multiple of de, and still have a mean temperature below boiling.
d. Optional: If you know the planets’ orbital radii, which ones are then candidates
for water-based life, using this rather oversimplified criterion?
an incident energy flux Ie of about 1.4kWm−2. In this problem, you’ll investigate
whether any other planets in our solar systemcould support the sort of water-based
life we find on Earth.
Consider a planet orbiting at distance d from the Sun (and let de be Earth’s distance).
The Sun’s energy flux at distance d is I = Ie(de/d)2, because energy flux decreases
as the inverse square of distance. Call the planet’s radius R, and suppose that
it absorbs a fraction α of the incident sunlight, reflecting the rest back into space. The
planet intercepts a disk of sunlight of area πR2, so it absorbs a total power of πR2αI.
Earth’s radius is about 6400 km.
The Sun has been shining for a long time, but Earth’s temperature is roughly
stable: The planet is in a steady state. For this to happen, the absorbed solar energy
must get reradiated back to space as fast as it arrives (see Figure 1.2). Because the rate
at which a body radiates heat depends on its temperature, we can find the expected
mean temperature of the planet, using the formula
radiated heat flux = ασT4.
In this formula, σ denotes the number 5.7·10−8Wm−2 K−4 (the “Stefan–Boltzmann
constant”). The formula gives the rate of energy loss per unit area of the radiating
body (here, the Earth). You needn’t understand the derivation of this formula but
make sure you do understand how the units work.
a. Using this formula, work out the average temperature at the Earth’s surface and
compare your answer to the actual value of 289K.
b. Using the formula, work out how far from the Sun a planet the size of Earth may
be, as a multiple of de, and still have a mean temperature greater than freezing.
c. Using the formula, work out how close to the Sun a planet the size of Earth may
be, as a multiple of de, and still have a mean temperature below boiling.
d. Optional: If you know the planets’ orbital radii, which ones are then candidates
for water-based life, using this rather oversimplified criterion?