I have question,The electron and hole concentration in a intrinsic

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the changes in electron and hole concentrations in intrinsic semiconductors when doped with p-type materials. Participants debate the correct equation that describes the relationship between these concentrations, with options including n+p = n1+p1 and np = n1p1. One participant suggests that the product of electron and hole concentrations remains constant, emphasizing that adding acceptor atoms increases hole concentration, which in turn affects electron concentration due to recombination. The consensus leans towards option (d), indicating that the product of the concentrations is a key principle in understanding semiconductor behavior. The conversation highlights foundational concepts in semiconductor physics for beginners.
mil
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have question,
The electron and hole concentration in a intrinsic semiconductor are n1 and p1 respectively.When doped with a p-type material these change to n and p repectively,then
a)n+p = n1+p1
b)n+n1= p+p1
c)np1 = n1p
d)np = n1p1

could anyone explain what would be the solution.
I am new to electronics and learning the concepts. I think the answer should be opton (b) as only electrons and holes can added before and after seperately.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think the Answer to your question should be (d).

When you start with the subject there is an explanation that product of the concentration of holes and electrons is always equal to a constant. Thus on addition of acceptor atoms there will be additonal holes which would alter the concentration of electrons also due to recombination but the fact that product of concentration is always a constant and is given by :- (For intrinsic semiconductor, n=p=[n(i)]^2 ) this constant always remains there !
 


Thanks for the update
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
88K