I think this question is impossible.

  • Thread starter VashtheStampede
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Impossible
In summary, the football was kicked at an angle of 45 degrees and it travels 82m before it hits the ground.
  • #1
VashtheStampede
9
0
a football is kicked at an angle of 45 degrees and it travels 82m before it hits the ground. Ignore air resistance

a. What is its initial velocity?

b. How long was it in the air?

c. How high did it go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, the only force acting on the ball is gravity. This means you can write parametric equations for the ball's position:
[tex]x=v_{0x}t[/tex]
[tex]y=v_{0y}t-\frac{1}{2}gt^2[/tex]
(assuming the ball starts at (0,0))
When the ball hits the ground, y=0. Using this you can start answering the questions.
 
  • #3
...? that confused me even more. You don't know the time, so I don't see how you can do it.
 
  • #4
Have you done an energy unit yet?
 
  • #5
no i have not good sir/mam
 
  • #6
ok, for a i got 20
b. 4.1
c.something
 
  • #7
VashtheStampede said:
...? that confused me even more. You don't know the time, so I don't see how you can do it.
Exactly, you don't know the time: that's what you're solving for! You have
[tex]y=v_{0y}t-\frac{1}{2}gt^2[/tex]
So when the ball hits the ground, y=0. This means:
[tex]0=v_{0y}t-\frac{1}{2}gt^2[/tex]
or
[tex]0=t(v_{0y}-\frac{1}{2}gt)[/tex]
You know that the ball starts off on the ground at t=0, you want to find the second time the ball hits the ground when t is not zero. Since t is not 0 you can divide it out to get:
[tex]v_{0y}-\frac{1}{2}gt=0[/tex]
Or
[tex]t=\frac{2v_{0y}}{g}[/tex]
Since the ball was kicked at a 45° angle v_0x=v_0y, so
[tex]t=\frac{2v_{0x}}{g}[/tex]
The second piece of information you're given is that the ball is 82m away at this time, or x=82m. Substitute in for time in the x equation and solve for v_0x. Once you've done this you can plug this into the equation for time to get a numeric answer for the time elapsed. Keep in mind that the total velocity is a vector when answering the first part.
 
  • #8
HINT: Textbook authors do not make a habit of putting impossible questions into the exercise sections. :)
 
  • #9
VashtheStampede said:
ok, for a i got 20
Keep in mind that the velocity is a vector; it has two components. This is only one component of the velocity.
VashtheStampede said:
b. 4.1
Almost right. Units?
VashtheStampede said:
c.something
The path of the ball is a parabola. to see this, solve for time in the x equation:
[tex]x=v_{0x}t[/tex]
[tex]\rightarrow t=\frac{x}{v_{0x}}[/tex]
Then sub this into the y equation:
[tex]y=v_{0y}t-\frac{1}{2}gt^2[/tex]
[tex]\rightarrow y=v_{0y}\frac{x}{v_{0x}}-\frac{1}{2}g(\frac{x}{v_{0x}})^2 [/tex]
[tex]y=x-\frac{1}{2}g(\frac{x}{v_{0x}})^2[/tex] (remember [tex]v_{0x}=v_{0y}[/tex])
Recall that the formula for the turning point of a parabola with equation
[tex]y=ax^2 + bx +c[/tex]
is
[tex]x=\frac{-b}{2a}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #10
The standard equation for the range is

[tex]R = \frac{|V|^{2}\sin 2\theta}{g}[/tex]

You should have the derivation of this in your notes, or you can use the method Euler has posted above multiplying the time in the air with the horizontal speed. Since you have |V| and the direction, you have the velocity.

For the 3rd part, you have worked out the time it is in the air for the 2nd part, so just apply that to purely vertical motion, where the initial speed is the vertical speed of the particle, or use Euler's method which is to give the height of the motion in terms of the distance travelled.
 

FAQ: I think this question is impossible.

What makes you think this question is impossible?

As a scientist, I have a deep understanding of the laws and principles that govern our world. Based on my knowledge and experience, I can confidently say that this question defies the fundamental laws of science and cannot be answered with any scientific explanation.

Can you provide any evidence to support your claim that this question is impossible?

While I cannot provide specific evidence for this particular question, I can refer to the vast body of scientific research and evidence that has been accumulated over centuries. This evidence supports the principles and laws of science that make this question impossible to answer.

Is it possible that there could be a solution to this question in the future?

As a scientist, I always keep an open mind and acknowledge that our understanding of the world is constantly evolving. However, based on our current scientific knowledge, it is highly unlikely that a solution to this question will be discovered in the future.

Are there any other fields of study that may be able to answer this question?

While there may be other fields of study that could provide insights on this question, ultimately it would still need to abide by the laws and principles of science. Any potential solution would need to be scientifically validated and reproducible in order to be considered a valid answer.

How can we as non-scientists understand why this question is impossible?

Science is a complex and constantly evolving field, and it may be difficult for non-scientists to fully comprehend the reasoning behind why a question is impossible. However, by keeping an open mind, learning about scientific principles, and seeking out reputable sources for information, non-scientists can gain a better understanding of why this question cannot be answered.

Back
Top