MHB IADPCFEVER's question at Yahoo Answers (projection and linear transformation)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a transformation projecting vectors from R^2 onto the line y=x is linear by expressing it as a matrix transformation. The transformation is defined mathematically, showing that the projection of a vector (x_0, y_0) results in the point ((x_0 + y_0)/2, (x_0 + y_0)/2). This projection can be represented using a matrix A, which confirms the linearity of the transformation. The proof involves verifying that the transformation satisfies the properties of linearity for any scalar multiples and vector additions. The conclusion establishes that the projection is indeed a linear map.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

I'm supposed to show that this transformation from R^2 to R^2 is linear by showing that it is a matrix transformation.

P projects a vector onto the line y=x

How do I go about?

Here is a link to the question:

Projection and linear transformation? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello IADPCFEVER,

Consider $(x_0.y_0)\in\mathbb{R}^2$. The perpendicular line to $r:y=x$ passing through $(x_0,y_0)$ is $s:y-y_0=-(x-x_0)$. The intersection point between $r$ and $s$ is:
$$\left \{ \begin{matrix}x-y=0\\x+y=x_0+y_0\end{matrix}\right.\Leftrightarrow\ldots\Leftrightarrow(x,y)=\left(\dfrac{x_0+y_0}{2},\dfrac{x_0+y_0}{2}\right)$$
That is, if $p:\mathbb{R}^2\to \mathbb{R}^2$ projects $(x_0,y_0)$ onto $r:y=x$ then,
$$p\begin{pmatrix}{x_0}\\{y_0}\end{pmatrix}= \dfrac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix}{x_0+y_0}\\{x_0+y_0}\end{pmatrix}= \dfrac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix}{1}&{1}\\{1}&{1}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}{x_0}\\{y_0}\end{pmatrix}=A \begin{pmatrix}{x_0}\\{y_0}\end{pmatrix}$$
Now, we easily prove that $p$ is a linear map. For all $\lambda,\mu\in\mathbb{R}$ and for all $v=(x_0,y_0)^t$, $v'=(x'_0,y'_0)^t$ in $\mathbb{R}^2$:
$$p(\lambda v+\mu v')=A(\lambda v+\mu v')=\lambda Av+\mu Av'=\lambda p(v)+\mu p(v')$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top