MHB Ice cream & yogurt matrices problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice Matrices
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a matrix representation of ice cream and yogurt prices at two stores, A and B. The correct matrix for prices is confirmed as A = [[40, 38], [30, 35]], representing the prices of ice cream and yogurt at each store. For the required 20 tubs of ice cream and 30 tubs of yogurt, the product of the matrices is calculated, resulting in costs of 1700 at store A and 1810 at store B. It is concluded that store A is more advantageous for purchasing the required items due to the lower total cost. The conversation also touches on communication issues regarding private messages.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
The price of a tub of ice cream and a tub of yoghurt respectively at store A and store B are given below.
Store A ( 40 , 30)
Store B ( 38 , 35)

(i) Represent the above information in a matrix of order 2 * 2, such that the columns denote the stores.

(ii) 20 tubs of ice cream and 30 tubs of yoghurt are required for a certain function. Represent these amounts by a matrix of order 1 * 2 and obtain the product of the two matrices.

(iii) By considering this product, write down with reasons, the store from which it is more advantageous to buy 20 tubs of ice cream and 30 tubs of yogurt.

So Depicting them in column matrices

i.$A=\begin{bmatrix}
40&30\\
38&35\end{bmatrix}$

ii.$B=\begin{bmatrix}
20&30\\
\end{bmatrix}$

Help me to do III and tell me whether the rest is correctly done?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathlearn said:
The price of a tub of ice cream and a tub of yoghurt respectively at store A and store B are given below.
Store A ( 40 , 30)
Store B ( 38 , 35)

(i) Represent the above information in a matrix of order 2 * 2, such that the columns denote the stores.

(ii) 20 tubs of ice cream and 30 tubs of yoghurt are required for a certain function. Represent these amounts by a matrix of order 1 * 2 and obtain the product of the two matrices.

(iii) By considering this product, write down with reasons, the store from which it is more advantageous to buy 20 tubs of ice cream and 30 tubs of yogurt.

So Depicting them in column matrices

i.$A=\begin{bmatrix}
40&30\\
38&35\end{bmatrix}$

ii.$B=\begin{bmatrix}
20&30\\
\end{bmatrix}$

Help me to do III and tell me whether the rest is correctly done?

I think i. should be,

$A=\begin{bmatrix}
40&38\\
30&35\end{bmatrix}$

In this way, column 1 represents store A, which stocks yogurt and ice cream at 40 and 30 units respectively. And likewise for column 2...

Btw i can't reply to your PM because your inbox is full!
 
Joppy said:
I think i. should be,

$A=\begin{bmatrix}
40&38\\
30&35\end{bmatrix}$

In this way, column 1 represents store A, which stocks yogurt and ice cream at 40 and 30 units respectively. And likewise for column 2...

Yes I think you're very correct :) & I need help for Question II & III .

mathlearn said:
(ii) 20 tubs of ice cream and 30 tubs of yoghurt are required for a certain function. Represent these amounts by a matrix of order 1 * 2 and obtain the product of the two matrices.

(iii) By considering this product, write down with reasons, the store from which it is more advantageous to buy 20 tubs of ice cream and 30 tubs of yogurt.
Joppy said:
Btw i can't reply to your PM because your inbox is full!

:) I think you should consider exporting the messages and deleting a folder

Many Thanks :)
 
Let's answer ii. and iii. at the same time. The function requires 30 tubs of yogurt and 20 tubs of ice cream (yum..). We know what the prices for these products are at both shops A and B.

I encourage you to think about how you would solve this problem without the use of matrices as it may come more natural.

$ \begin{bmatrix} 20&30\ \end{bmatrix} * \begin{bmatrix}
40&38\\
30&35\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}
(20*40 + 30 * 30)&(20 * 38 + 30 * 35)\\
\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1700&1810\ \end{bmatrix}$

Do you know why we can multiply these two matrices together? Can you think of a case when we could not?

This settles part ii. i think, and for iii., we can easily see that the more 'advantageous' supermarket to shop from (for this order) would be shop A. This is because 1700 < 1810, where 1700 units is the price it would cost for 20 ice creams and 30 yogurts at shop A.

Hope this helps! If something doesn't make sense or i made a mistake, let me know :).
 
You're explained it perfectly :), I think you deserve an ice cream or a yogurt

View attachment 5908

Thank you very much :) Joppy
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    2.4 KB · Views: 101
mathlearn said:
:) I think you should consider exporting the messages and deleting a folder

Many Thanks :)

Hahaha what! It's your inbox that needs emptying!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top