Identifying Critical Points: Local Extrema

  • Thread starter Slimsta
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Local
In summary, the student is having trouble with 4 on the homework and is seeking help from his teacher. The teacher tries to help but the student is not sure if 4 is correct. The teacher offers the student the opportunity to try true instead of false and the student gets all of the answers correct but the fourth one, which is false. The student believes that the first three statements must be correct because they are from the textbook. However, the student realizes that the last statement, which is false, is the problem and not one of the first three.
  • #1
Slimsta
190
0

Homework Statement


http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8899/85779053.jpg

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


could you please check my answers.. I am pretty sure they are good but i just want to be sure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
i'm not so sure about number 4
 
  • #3
lanedance said:
i'm not so sure about number 4

i don't know i think it should be false. i tried putting true though and it didnt work. any other ideas?
 
  • #4
Slimsta said:
i don't know i think it should be false. i tried putting true though and it didnt work. any other ideas?

Statement 4 is correct, being "false."

If f(x) is on [a,b] and there is an absolute min at a or b, it does not mean f'(a)=0 or f'(b)=0.

Statement 5 is wrong. It should be "true."

Critical points are where f'(x)=0 and where f'(x) does not exist.

Let f(x)=x3 then f'(x)=3x2

f'(x)=0 at x=0. Therfore x=0 is a critical point. But is not a max or min.

A local extremum must occur at a critical point, but opposite is not true.

Image02.gif
 
  • #5
it still shows me that its wrong.
i got everything 'true' but the 4th one which is 'false', and it doesn't work..
im sure 100% about the first 3 because they are straight from the textbook..
any ideas?
 
  • #6
Oh, I believe the last one should also be false.

I line with no extrema from x=a to x=b will have absolute min and max at the endpoints, being a and b. Just because it is continuous does not mean it has relative extrema at c and d between the endpoints a and b.
 
  • #7
vwishndaetr said:
Oh, I believe the last one should also be false.

I line with no extrema from x=a to x=b will have absolute min and max at the endpoints, being a and b. Just because it is continuous does not mean it has relative extrema at c and d between the endpoints a and b.

nope..
i tried this:
true, true, true, false, true
true, true, true, false, false
true, true, true, true, true
true, true, true, true, false

all wrong. so it must be one of the first 3.. but they must be 100% right because they are from the textbook..
 
  • #8
vwishndaetr said:
Oh, I believe the last one should also be false.

I line with no extrema from x=a to x=b will have absolute min and max at the endpoints, being a and b. Just because it is continuous does not mean it has relative extrema at c and d between the endpoints a and b.

False? The question says c and d in [a,b]. Not in (a,b).
 
  • #9
Dick said:
False? The question says c and d in [a,b]. Not in (a,b).

I don't understand your argument. a and b are included in the interval. Therefore x=a and x=b are in the domain. Are they not?
 
  • #10
vwishndaetr said:
I don't understand your argument. a and b are included in the interval. Therefore x=a and x=b are in the domain. Are they not?

Yes, a and b are in the domain, otherwise it wouldn't be true. They are also candidates to be c and d. It just says c and d are in [a,b], not (a,b). How could a continuous function on a closed interval not have a max and a min? Can you give me an example?
 
  • #11
Maybe I am reading the statement wrong.

I do not doubt that there will be a max or min. Just as you said, there has to be a max and min on [a,b]. But when the statement says that "f attains a max f(c) and min f(d) at some numbers c and d in [a,b]," I guess I am assuming that they have to have a max or min at c and d. I am also assuming c and d cannot equal a and b.

I say false because a straight line with say slope 3, would be continuous, but would have max and min at the endpoints, not between a and b, for c and d not equal to a and b.

Lots of letters being tossed around. I hope I'm not yapping in circles.
 
  • #12
It says c and d are in [a,b]. I'm pretty sure that as it's stated they allow the case of c or d being endpoints.
 
  • #13
But aren't a and be the endpoints?

So if it said c and d were endpoints, then it would be [c,d].

I don't like that statement.
 
  • #14
the thing is, false or true, looks like this isn't the problem anyways.. it must be the first 2.. which one could be wrong?
 
  • #15
Slimsta said:
the thing is, false or true, looks like this isn't the problem anyways.. it must be the first 2.. which one could be wrong?

2 is wrong. Can you explain why? Suppose f is continuous?
 
  • #16
wel because an abs.value is the highest point on the graph and it has to have a curve the it continues, otherwise it wouldn't be abs.value...

so right now i have everything set on 'true' and the 3rd and 4th are 'false' and its wrong.. :(
 
  • #17
You seem to be just flipping back and forth without much discussion of why you think any particular line is true or false. There's 2^6=64 possible ways to frame an answer here. You probably aren't going hit on the correct combination by guessing. Or listening to opinions.
 
  • #18
what do u mean.. i read every single comment and explained my point of view for some questions.
okay for the 3rd one,
" If f has a local maximum or minimum at c, then c is a critical number of f. "
it must be 'false' because critical number is the absolute max/min value isn't it?
 
  • #19
I would define a critical number as a point where the derivative of f is zero or the derivative doesn't exist. What's your definition? That definitely doesn't mean it's automatically an absolute max/min.
 
  • #20
Dick said:
I would define a critical number as a point where the derivative of f is zero or the derivative doesn't exist. What's your definition? That definitely doesn't mean it's automatically an absolute max/min.

well there is pretty much only one def and u gave it already..
i just didnt think about it for some reason.

that would mean that " If f has a local maximum or minimum at c, then c is a critical number of f. " is true because when there is a local maximum or minimum, its going to be 0 when taking the derivative.
am i right?

and that would pretty much be the same for "If c is not a critical point of f, then c is not a local minimum of f. " - true because if the derivative isn't 0 (or undefined) then there wouldn't be a local minimum (or anything else)
 
  • #21
Sort of. But if c is NOT a critical point then the derivative IS defined and not equal to zero, so it's not a local max or min. You can have a critical point where the derivative is not defined, like f(x)=|x| when c=0.
 
  • #22
Dick said:
Sort of. But if c is NOT a critical point then the derivative IS defined and not equal to zero, so it's not a local max or min. You can have a critical point where the derivative is not defined, like f(x)=|x| when c=0.

yeah that's what i meant.. sorry.. i was just rushing when i typed :b
i think i got it. thanks a lot for ur help buddy!
 

FAQ: Identifying Critical Points: Local Extrema

What is a local maximum value?

A local maximum value is the highest point of a function within a specific interval. It is also known as a relative maximum value, as there may be higher points on the function outside of the specified interval.

How do you find the local maximum values of a function?

To find the local maximum values of a function, you must first take the derivative of the function and set it equal to zero. Then, solve for the variable to find the critical points. Next, plug these points into the original function to determine the corresponding y-values. The largest y-value within the specified interval is the local maximum value.

Can a function have multiple local maximum values?

Yes, a function can have multiple local maximum values. This occurs when the function has multiple peaks within the specified interval.

What is a local minimum value?

A local minimum value is the lowest point of a function within a specific interval. Like a local maximum value, it is also known as a relative minimum value.

How do you determine if a critical point is a local maximum or minimum value?

To determine if a critical point is a local maximum or minimum value, you must analyze the concavity of the function at that point. If the function is concave up (positive second derivative), then the critical point is a local minimum value. If the function is concave down (negative second derivative), then the critical point is a local maximum value.

Similar threads

Slope of a tangent From first principles
Replies
2
Views
2K
Riemann sum question, with picture
Replies
1
Views
2K
Definite Integrals - Average Values, Integration Rules?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Local Extrema: Homework Solution Analysis
Replies
1
Views
1K
Divergence and Curl of Unit Vectors?
Replies
2
Views
10K
How do I find critical points and determine local extrema for a given function?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Show that grad f(x) = 0 when x is a local minimum of f
Replies
8
Views
3K
Prove that solutions to autonomous first order DE can't have local maxima
Replies
2
Views
914
Solve Insane Integral: Note do = 2*pi*sin(x) dx
Replies
1
Views
2K
Using an ODE to show a local minimum
Replies
5
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top