If f is meromorphic on U with only a finite number of poles, then

In summary, if f is meromorphic on U with only a finite number of poles, then it can be represented as the quotient of two analytic functions g and h on U, where h has only removable singularities at the poles of f. This can be shown by considering the order of the poles and using the fact that fh has only removable singularities.
  • #1
fauboca
158
0
If f is meromorphic on U with only a finite number of poles, then [itex]f=\frac{g}{h}[/itex] where g and h are analytic on U.

We say f is meromorphic, then f is defined on U except at discrete set of points S which are poles. If [itex]z_0[/itex] is such a point, then there exist m in integers such that [itex](z-z_0)^mf(z)[/itex] is holomorphic in a neighborhood of [itex]z_0[/itex].

A pole is [itex]\lim_{z\to a}|f(z)| =\infty[/itex].

S0 the trouble is showing that f is the quotient of two holomorphic functions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


How would you show it if there is only one pole?
 
  • #3


Dick said:
How would you show it if there is only one pole?

If the pole is at z_0, then

[tex]f=\frac{g}{(z-z_0)}[/tex]

Let S be the set of the poles of f in U and let h be analytic in U with singularities at the points in S. Let the order of the singularity be the order of the pole in f. Then fh has only removable singularities in U.

[tex]fh=g\Rightarrow f=\frac{g}{h}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #4


fauboca said:
If the pole is at z_0, then

[tex]f=\frac{g}{(z-z_0)}[/tex]

Let S be the set of the poles of f in U and let h be analytic in U with singularities at the points in S. Let the order of the singularity be the order of the pole in f. Then fh has only removable singularities in U.

[tex]fh=g\Rightarrow f=\frac{g}{h}[/tex]

You want h to have 'zeroes', not 'singularities'.
 

FAQ: If f is meromorphic on U with only a finite number of poles, then

1. What does it mean for a function to be meromorphic?

A meromorphic function is a complex-valued function that is analytic everywhere except for a finite number of isolated points, where it has poles. This means that the function is well-behaved and can be represented by a power series in its domain, except at a finite number of points where it is undefined.

2. What is the significance of a function having a finite number of poles?

A finite number of poles means that the function is well-behaved and has a smooth representation, except for a few isolated points where it is undefined. This is important in many mathematical and physical applications, as it allows for the use of techniques such as Cauchy's residue theorem and the evaluation of complex integrals.

3. How does the finiteness of poles affect the behavior of a function?

The finiteness of poles means that the function is well-behaved and has a finite number of singularities. This means that the function is continuous and differentiable everywhere except at these finite number of points where it has poles. In other words, the function has a smooth and well-defined behavior in its domain.

4. Can a function have both poles and essential singularities?

Yes, a function can have both poles and essential singularities. A pole is a type of singularity where the function approaches infinity, while an essential singularity is a type of singularity where the function has no limit as it approaches the singularity. These two types of singularities do not exclude each other, and a function can have both in its domain.

5. How can the presence of poles affect the convergence of a function's power series representation?

The presence of poles can affect the convergence of a function's power series representation. If a function has a pole at a point within its domain, the power series expansion will only converge for values of the function within a certain radius of that point. This is known as the convergence radius and it can be calculated using techniques such as the Cauchy-Hadamard theorem.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top