If humans evolve from apes, why didn't all apes evolve at the same rate?

  • Thread starter ShawnD
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Rate
In summary: There are going to be gaps in the fossil record because the two groups haven't overlapped in enough time for their fossilized remains to get mixed up.
  • #36


Orion1 said:
Humans are not apes, they are hominids, Humans and Apes are both primates.
You are dealing with some rather dated nomenclature, Orion1. DNA analysis pretty much killed that old classification. Humans are now classified as apes (a superfamily). We are in fact classified as one of the great apes (the family Hominidae), along with orangutans, gorillas, and chimps. The close association between humans and apes goes a lot deeper than familiy. we are classified along with chimps and gorillas at the subfamility level (Homininae) and along with chimps at the tribe (between genus and subfamily) level (Hominini). The difference between humans and chimps is very, very slight. We are apes.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #37
primate evolution...


Wikipedia said:
An ape is any member of the Hominoidea superfamily of primates, including humans. Due to its ambiguous nature, the term ape has been deemphasized in favor of Hominoidea as a means of describing taxonomic relationships.

Until a few decades ago, humans were thought to be distinctly set apart from the other apes (even from the other great apes), so much so that many people still do not think of the term "apes" to include humans at all. However, it is not considered accurate by many biologists to think of apes in a biological sense without considering humans to be included.

hominoid taxonomy has undergone several changes. Genetic analysis shows that apes diverged from the Old World monkeys between 29 million and 34.5 million years ago. The lesser and greater apes split about 18 million years ago, and the hominid splits happened 14 million years ago (Pongo), 7 million years ago (Gorilla), and 3-5 million years ago (Homo & Pan).
Thanks for the modern taxonomic clarification.

Is the superfamily Hominoidea 29 million to 34.5 million years old?

Wikipedia said:
The New World monkeys split from the Old World about 40 million years ago, while the apes diverged from the Old World monkeys about 25 million years ago.

Does the superfamily Hominoidea branch from the superfamily Cercopithecoidea at this point?

One of the earliest primate fossils discovered thus far in the fossil record are called Godinotia, and is 49 million years old, and the primate lineage is thought go back to at least 65 million years, even though the oldest known primate from the fossil record is Plesiadapis, which is 55 – 58 million years old from the Late Paleocene.

Was Godinotia a prosimian that evolved from Strepsirhines 49 million years ago?

Plesiadapis is a member of superfamily Plesiadapoidea, did Hominoidea and Cercopithecoidea originate from Plesiadapoidea?

Wikipedia said:
Haplorrhini and its sister clade, Strepsirrhini ("wet-nosed" primates), parted ways about 63 million years ago.

Did all primates originate from Strepsirhines and Haplorhines 63 million years ago?

Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ape"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ape#Changes_in_taxonomy"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ape#Classification_and_evolution"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godinotia"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plesiadapis"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_World_monkey"
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_X5FQxL_6WOA/SSqRje9lngI/AAAAAAAAAKQ/jVAZ2KbbA2c/s1600-h/famtree4.gif"
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_X5FQxL_6WOA/SSqRPKgKzXI/AAAAAAAAAKA/3AyBCZEkwPg/s320/phillytree.gif"
http://kevinunderhill.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/10/20/primates_tree.gif"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strepsirrhini"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplorrhini"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosimian"
 

Attachments

  • Strepsirhines.jpg
    Strepsirhines.jpg
    47 KB · Views: 733
  • Haplorhines.jpg
    Haplorhines.jpg
    70.7 KB · Views: 494
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #38
CRGreathouse said:
And how would you define that? Be careful, too, if you use the concept of an "individual" in your definition, unless you also define what that means.

I did offer a measure of complexity...

Humans for example can access many more states of being than a bug. We can count the number of states (even if roughly) to get a measure of our relative complexity.
 
  • #39
mgb_phys said:
Civilisations rise and fall for a variety of internal and external reasons.
Sheer, dumb luck is one of the big factors leading to the rise of civilizations while plain old bad luck certainly helps civilizations fall. You mentioned East Africa, mgb. Bad luck for them that the fertile Sahara turned back into the desert Sahara.

Civilization rose in the Fertile Crescent and China in part because those people were in the right place. South Africa has an equally nice climate. The Fertile Crescent had wild sheep, goats, horses, cows. South Africa has antelopes, zebras, and cape buffalo. Antelopes are too jumpy, literally and figuratively, to domesticate. Zebras and cape buffalo are amongst the meanest of animals. Bad luck for civilization in southern Africa. Sheer dumb luck that sheep, goats, horses, and cows happen to have the traits that make them domesticable.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
39K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top