If Jupiter had a 5th large moon until "recently", would we know?

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of a fifth moon in Jupiter's system and whether we would be able to determine if it existed in the past. The answer is that there is no immediate evidence, but it would require a hypothesis and supporting evidence to be accepted as a theory.
  • #1
xpell
140
16
TL;DR Summary
If Jupiter had had another large moon and lost it relatively recently (e.g. 1 billion yeas or so), would we be able to realize it nowadays? How?
Hi! I'm fascinated by the apparent "concentration" of the four large Galilean moons in a barely 1.5 million km "strip", and the vast, "empty" distance to the next moons (moonlets?) Out of a purely aesthetic sense of horror vacui, :wink: I've always wondered if there was at least another Jovian moon (or more) beween Callisto (orbital radius = 1,883,000 km) and the very tiny Themisto (7,405,000 km) or more possibly the Himalia Group (starting at 11.2 million km.)

I'm aware that the large "Jupiter system" is thought to have had several "generations" of moons that spiraled into the planet during or shortly after its formation, and that this process tended to favor the final stabilization of moons relatively close to the planet ---in that "strip." But I'm wondering if additional moons could have formed and survived beyond Callisto, only to be lost later by whatever reason (Impact? Orbital instability? A passing object that expelled it/them to the outer confines of the solar system or wherever?)

Whatever. My question is: if Jupiter had had a fifth moon and lost it in relatively recent astronomical times (let's say 1 billion years or so), would we be able to realize it nowadays? How, please?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think it's not about "realizing" it; it's about some proponent creating an hypothesis and then a simulation that shows it's possible. But possible merely means it's not impossible.

That something is not impossible is not really evidence that it may have happened.

It would need some sort of corroborating evidence to support it.

I'm not sure what evidence you could get without the hypothesis including an existing culprit somewhere in the system. Perhaps an analysis of elemental ratios seem to match Jupiter or his children or somesuch.

Even my logic is hypothetical.
 
  • Like
Likes xpell
  • #3
Hi, Dave, thank you very much. Yes, I fully agree that:

DaveC426913 said:
But possible merely means it's not impossible. That something is not impossible is not really evidence that it may have happened. It would need some sort of corroborating evidence to support it. (...) Even my logic is hypothetical.

Indeed. However, my question (in my mind, at least...) was more like, "If it had happened, do we have the tools to learn or deduct that it did? What are those tools? Or would it be immediately obvious because this-and-that?"
 
  • #4
xpell said:
Indeed. However, my question (in my mind, at least...) was more like, "If it had happened, do we have the tools to learn or deduct that it did? What are those tools? Or would it be immediately obvious because this-and-that?"
That is indeed the question I attempted to answer, including a suggestion of some of the tools.

It's not as simple as 'did it happen'. Most celestial science is about 'This may have happened. Let's make a model to see if it makes sense, and look for more evidence.' You never know for certain, you just have a strong, well-supported theory. If it's compelling enough - and answers more question than it raises - then it has taken its first steps toward an accepted theory.

Compare to a similar (but unrelated) deep history hypothesis such as The Giant Impact Hypothesis of Earth's childhood for some ideas about how we look for evidence to bolster such concepts. (It was first proposed by Darwin in 1898 - and it's still "just" an hypothesis (i.e. not widely accepted.)TL;DR: No there is no immediate smoking gun that would tell us there used to be a fifth Galilaen moon. It would need a hypothesis that is then supported with evidence. That would take years of research and analysis.
 
  • Like
Likes xpell
  • #5
DaveC426913 said:
TL;DR: No there is no immediate smoking gun that would tell us there used to be a fifth Galilaen moon.
Thank you again, Dave. :smile: This part was especially important for me. I didn't want to pass for an ignorant just by asking, "Hey, what if that big guy had another moon or a couple of them?" and be slammed with an avalanche of, "Are you silly?! That is totally impossible because of this obvious thing!" answers. Now I know that I can ask. :redface:
 

FAQ: If Jupiter had a 5th large moon until "recently", would we know?

How do we know if Jupiter had a 5th large moon until recently?

Scientists use various methods to study the moons of Jupiter, including telescopes, spacecraft missions, and computer simulations. By analyzing data and observations from these sources, they can determine the existence and characteristics of moons around Jupiter.

What is considered a "large" moon for Jupiter?

In general, a large moon is defined as a natural satellite that is at least 240 kilometers in diameter. However, this definition can vary depending on the context and the specific criteria used by scientists.

Why is it important to know if Jupiter had a 5th large moon until recently?

Understanding the history and evolution of Jupiter's moons can provide valuable insights into the formation and development of the entire Jupiter system. It can also help us better understand the processes that shape and influence the moons of gas giants in our solar system.

How could a 5th large moon have gone unnoticed until recently?

Jupiter's moons are constantly changing and evolving due to various factors such as tidal forces, collisions, and gravitational interactions with other bodies. It is possible that a smaller or less visible moon could have merged with a larger one, making it difficult to detect until recent advancements in technology.

What evidence would we look for to confirm the existence of a 5th large moon around Jupiter?

Scientists would look for a variety of evidence, including changes in the orbits of other moons, disturbances in the gravitational field of Jupiter, and observations of potential debris or remnants from the moon. They may also use computer simulations to model the potential effects of a 5th large moon on the Jupiter system.

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top