If Σc_nx^n converges does Σc_n·nx^(n-1) converge as well?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter OhMyMarkov
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the convergence of a power series and whether its derivative also converges. The proof provided shows that the derivative series does converge within the same radius of convergence as the original series, and can be integrated term by term. This leads to the conclusion that the derivative is continuous and differentiable.
  • #1
OhMyMarkov
83
0
Hello Everyone!

Following my earlier post, I've been trying to prove something that uses the convergence of a power series (which I will reveal should I succeed to complete the proof).

Suppose the series $\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n$ converges for all real $|x|<R$ where $R$ is the radius of convergence. Now, does $\sum _{n=1} ^{\infty} c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

I am reluctant to write the following:
|$\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^{n-1}|$ $<|\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n|$

because $x$ can be bigger than 1.

However, with a simple change of variables $k=n-1$, I obtain the following:
$S=\sum _{k=0} ^{\infty} c_k k x^k$ is a series that converges for:
$|x|<R'=\displaystyle \frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{c_k k}}=\frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{k}}$ $\cdot \displaystyle \frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{c_k}}=1.R = R$

Hence, $S$ converges...

Is the proof correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re: If $\sum c_n x^n$ converges does $\sum c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

OhMyMarkov said:
Hello Everyone!

Following my earlier post, I've been trying to prove something that uses the convergence of a power series (which I will reveal should I succeed to complete the proof).

Suppose the series $\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n$ converges for all real $|x|<R$ where $R$ is the radius of convergence. Now, does $\sum _{n=1} ^{\infty} c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

I am reluctant to write the following:
|$\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^{n-1}|$ $<|\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n|$

because $x$ can be bigger than 1.

However, with a simple change of variables $k=n-1$, I obtain the following:
$S=\sum _{k=0} ^{\infty} c_k k x^k$ is a series that converges for:
$|x|<R'=\displaystyle \frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{c_k k}}=\frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{k}}$ $\cdot \displaystyle \frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{c_k}}=1.R = R$

Hence, $S$ converges...

Is the proof correct?
Yes, the proof is correct*. The two power series always have the same radius of convergence.

* Edit. ... except that you should have used $|c_k|$ instead of $c_k$ (because otherwise you might not be able to take the $k$th root, if $c_k$ is negative).
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Re: If $\sum c_n x^n$ converges does $\sum c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

OhMyMarkov said:
Hello Everyone!

Following my earlier post, I've been trying to prove something that uses the convergence of a power series (which I will reveal should I succeed to complete the proof).

Suppose the series $\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n$ converges for all real $|x|<R$ where $R$ is the radius of convergence. Now, does $\sum _{n=1} ^{\infty} c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

I am reluctant to write the following:
|$\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^{n-1}|$ $<|\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n|$

because $x$ can be bigger than 1.

However, with a simple change of variables $k=n-1$, I obtain the following:
$S=\sum _{k=0} ^{\infty} c_k k x^k$ is a series that converges for:
$|x|<R'=\displaystyle \frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{c_k k}}=\frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{k}}$ $\cdot \displaystyle \frac{1}{\lim \sup \sqrt[k]{c_k}}=1.R = R$

Hence, $S$ converges...

Is the proof correct?

In Your 'earlier post' it has benn demonstrated that if $\displaystyle f(x)= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n}\ z^{n}$ converges absolutely for |x|<R, then f(x) is analytic for any |x|<R and its derivative is also analityc for |x|<R, so that f'(x) can be written as... $\displaystyle f^{\ '} (x)= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_{n}\ x^{n-1}$ ... where... $\displaystyle b_{n}= n\ a_{n}$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #4
Re: If $\sum c_n x^n$ converges does $\sum c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

To explain what I am trying to prove in these two posts:

If $\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n$ converges for $\forall |x|<R$ to $f(x)$, show that $f(x)$ is continuous (this was these two posts).

@chisigma
My next step is to show that $f$ is differentiable with the derivative function exactly as the one you have written...
 
  • #5
Re: If $\sum c_n x^n$ converges does $\sum c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

OhMyMarkov said:
To explain what I am trying to prove in these two posts:

If $\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n$ converges for $\forall |x|<R$ to $f(x)$, show that $f(x)$ is continuous (this was these two posts).

@chisigma
My next step is to show that $f$ is differentiable with the derivative function exactly as the one you have written...
Since $\sum _{n=1} ^{\infty} nc_n x^{n-1}$ has the same radius of convergence $R$ as $\sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} c_n x^n$, it must converge (within that radius of convergence) to some function, say $g(x) = \sum _{n=1} ^{\infty} nc_n x^{n-1}.$ In fact, that series converges uniformly in any closed interval contained in $(-R,R)$. But a uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous and integrable, and can be integrated term by term. (Those are standard theorems that you should be able to find in any analysis text.) Therefore $\displaystyle\int g(x)\,dx = f(x)$ (plus a constant), from which it follows that $f'(x) = g(x).$
 
  • #6
Re: If $\sum c_n x^n$ converges does $\sum c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

A 'rigorous' statement of the problem requires the use of the so-called 'Cauchy Integral Formula' , according to which if f(z) is analytic inside and on a simple closed line C and z=a is inside C, then...

$\displaystyle f^{(n)} (a) = \frac{n!}{2\ \pi\ i}\ \oint_{C} \frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^{n+1}}\ dz$ (1)

If f(z) is analytic for z=a, then its Taylor expansion is...

$\displaystyle f(z)= a_{0} + a_{1}\ (z-a) + a_{2}\ (z-a)^{2} + ... = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_{k}\ (z-a)^{k}$ (2)

Now if we integrate (2) and take into account that...

$\displaystyle \oint_{C} \frac{dz}{(z-a)^k} = \begin{cases}0 & \text{if } k \ne 1\\
2\ \pi\ i & \text{if } k=1 \end{cases}$ (3)

... setting n=0 in (1) we obtain...

$\displaystyle a_{k} = \frac{1}{2\ \pi\ i}\ \oint_{C} \frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^{k+1}}\ dz$ (3)

In similar way, writing...

$\displaystyle f^{\ '}(z)= b_{0} + b_{1}\ (z-a) + b_{2}\ (z-a)^{2} + ... = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} b_{k}\ (z-a)^{k}$ (2)

... and setting n=1 in (1) we obtain...

$\displaystyle b_{k} = \frac{k+1}{2\ \pi\ i}\ \oint_{C} \frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^{k+2}}\ dz = (k+1)\ a_{k+1}$ (4)

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Re: If $\sum c_n x^n$ converges does $\sum c_n nx^{n-1}$ converge as well?

chisigma said:
A 'rigorous' statement of the problem requires the use of the so-called 'Cauchy Integral Formula' , according to which if f(z) is analytic inside and on a simple closed line C and z=a is inside C, then...

$\displaystyle f^{(n)} (a) = \frac{n!}{2\ \pi\ i}\ \oint_{C} \frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^{n+1}}\ dz$ (1)
It is certainly not necessary to use the heavy machinery of complex analysis to give a rigorous proof of this result about a function of a real variable. Standard results from real analysis (uniform convergence theorems, as in comment #5 above) are all that is needed.
 

FAQ: If Σc_nx^n converges does Σc_n·nx^(n-1) converge as well?

What is the difference between Σc_nx^n and Σc_n·nx^(n-1)?

The difference between these two series is the exponent of x. In Σc_nx^n, the exponent is n, while in Σc_n·nx^(n-1), the exponent is n-1. This means that the second series has an additional factor of n, which can affect its convergence.

Why is the convergence of Σc_n·nx^(n-1) dependent on the convergence of Σc_nx^n?

The convergence of Σc_n·nx^(n-1) is dependent on Σc_nx^n because the additional factor of n can change the rate of convergence. If Σc_nx^n converges, then the terms of the series approach zero. However, the terms of Σc_n·nx^(n-1) may not approach zero as quickly, leading to a slower or even non-convergent series.

Can Σc_n·nx^(n-1) converge if Σc_nx^n diverges?

Yes, it is possible for Σc_n·nx^(n-1) to converge even if Σc_nx^n diverges. This is because the additional factor of n can change the rate of convergence and potentially make the series converge even if the original series diverges.

What is the relationship between the convergence of Σc_nx^n and Σc_n·nx^(n-1)?

The relationship between the convergence of Σc_nx^n and Σc_n·nx^(n-1) is that the convergence of the second series is dependent on the convergence of the first. If Σc_nx^n converges, then Σc_n·nx^(n-1) may also converge, but it is not guaranteed. If Σc_nx^n diverges, then Σc_n·nx^(n-1) may still converge or diverge.

How can I determine if Σc_n·nx^(n-1) converges or diverges?

Determining the convergence or divergence of Σc_n·nx^(n-1) requires evaluating the limit as n approaches infinity of the absolute value of c_n·nx^(n-1). If this limit is equal to zero, then the series converges. If the limit is non-zero or does not exist, then the series diverges. However, this method is not always conclusive and further tests, such as the ratio test or root test, may be necessary to determine convergence or divergence.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Back
Top