If the solution of a field vanishes on-shell does it mean anything?

In summary, the speaker is an expert summarizer and does not respond or reply to questions. They only provide a summary of the content.
  • #1
Baela
17
2
Let us consider an action ##S=S(a,b,c)## which is a functional of the fields ##a,\, b,\,## and ##c##. The solution of the field ##c## is given by the expression ##f(a,b)##. On taking into account the relations obtained from the solutions for ##a## and ##b##, we find that ##f(a,b)=0##. If the solution for the field ##c## vanishes on-shell, does it mean anything particular?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Yes, the fact that the solution for the field ##c## vanishes on-shell has a specific meaning in this context. It means that when the fields ##a## and ##b## satisfy the equations of motion, the field ##c## automatically satisfies the equation ##f(a,b)=0##. This is known as the on-shell condition for the field ##c##.

Physically, this on-shell condition indicates that the field ##c## does not have any independent dynamics and its behavior is completely determined by the fields ##a## and ##b##. This can be interpreted as a constraint on the dynamics of the system, where the value of ##c## is completely determined by the values of ##a## and ##b## at every point in spacetime.

In some cases, the on-shell condition for a field may also arise due to symmetries or conservation laws in the system. For example, if the action ##S## is invariant under a certain symmetry transformation, then the on-shell condition for the corresponding field would be a consequence of this symmetry.

In summary, the vanishing of the solution for a field on-shell has a significant meaning and can provide insights into the dynamics and symmetries of the system.
 

Related to If the solution of a field vanishes on-shell does it mean anything?

What does "on-shell" mean in the context of field theory?

"On-shell" refers to conditions where fields satisfy their equations of motion. In other words, it describes situations where the fields obey the physical laws governing their dynamics, such as the Klein-Gordon equation for scalar fields or the Dirac equation for fermionic fields.

If a solution of a field vanishes on-shell, does it imply the field is physically irrelevant?

Not necessarily. If a field vanishes on-shell, it means that under the physical conditions described by the equations of motion, the field does not contribute. However, the field might still play a role off-shell (i.e., not satisfying the equations of motion) or in other contexts such as in gauge fixing or in the structure of the theory.

How does a vanishing field solution on-shell affect the physical observables of a theory?

If a field solution vanishes on-shell, it typically means that the field does not contribute directly to physical observables when the system is in a state that satisfies the equations of motion. However, its presence might still affect the theory’s structure, such as symmetries or interactions, indirectly influencing other fields and observables.

Can a field that vanishes on-shell still influence quantum corrections or virtual processes?

Yes, a field that vanishes on-shell can still influence quantum corrections or virtual processes. In quantum field theory, fields contribute to loop diagrams and virtual particle exchanges even if their classical on-shell value is zero. These contributions can affect renormalization, effective potentials, and other quantum corrections.

Does a vanishing on-shell solution indicate a possible symmetry of the theory?

In some cases, a vanishing on-shell solution might indicate a symmetry of the theory. For example, in gauge theories, certain fields can be set to zero by a choice of gauge, reflecting a gauge symmetry. Similarly, a vanishing solution might be associated with spontaneous symmetry breaking or other symmetry-related phenomena.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
659
  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
958
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
943
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top