Image formed by lens-water-mirror system

  • Thread starter Thread starter ConorDMK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image System
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the image position and lateral magnification for a lens-water-mirror system involving a double-convex lens with a focal length of 40 cm in air, submerged in water with a refractive index of 4/3. Participants emphasize the complexity of the algebra involved and suggest a numerical approach to simplify the calculations, particularly due to potential sign errors. The importance of plugging in values progressively is highlighted to ensure the results remain logical throughout the process. Despite the challenges, one participant humorously notes their decision to derive the full algebraic expression for the final image and magnification, adding a light-hearted touch to the technical discussion. The conversation underscores the intricacies of optics problems and the strategies for tackling them effectively.
ConorDMK
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A symmetric, double-convex, thin lens made of glass with n = 1.52 has a focal length in air of 40 cm. The lens is sealed into the opening in the left-hand of a tank filled with water (n = 4/3). At the right-hand end of the tank is a plane mirror 90 cm from the lens. Find the position and lateral magnification of the image formed by the lens-water-mirror system of a small object outside the tank on the lens axis and 70 cm to the left of the lens.

Variables:
f=focal length=40cm,
na=refractive index of air=1,
ng=refractive index of glass=1.52,
nw=refractive index of water=4/3,
x=distance from lens to mirror=90cm,
s1=object distance=70cm

Homework Equations


1/f=(ng-na)(1/R1-1/R2)

na/s1+ng/s'1=(ng-na)/R1

ng/s2+nw/s'2=(nw-ng)/R2

The Attempt at a Solution


As the lens is symmetrical, R1=-R2
⇒ 1/f=(ng-na)(1/R1-1/R2)=(ng-na)(1/R1+1/R1)
⇒ 1/f=(ng-na)(2/R1)
⇒ R1=2f(ng-na)

Using -s'1=s2
na/s1+ng/s'1=(ng-na)/R1
⇒s'1=ng/(((ng-na)/R1)-(na/s1))

s2=ng/(((nw-ng)/(-R1))-(ng/s'2))

⇒-ng/(((ng-na)/R1)-(na/s1))=ng/(((nw-ng)/(-R1))-(ng/s'2))

⇒((ng-na)/R1)-(na/s1)=((nw-ng)/R1)+(ng/s'2)

⇒s'2=nw/(((ng-na)/R1)-(na/s1)-((nw-ng)/R1))

And s3=x-s'2

But this is where my friends and I get bogged down in where everything is supposed to be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest that you plug in numbers as you go so that you work out each step numerically. I know this goes against the general rule of working all the way to the end symbolically and then substituting numbers, but the algebra in this case is obviously getting out of hand. By plugging the numbers in as you go, you can also see if your answers are making sense as you go. This problem is a field of land mines in regard to signs.
 
TSny said:
I suggest that you plug in numbers as you go so that you work out each step numerically. I know this goes against the general rule of working all the way to the end symbolically and then substituting numbers, but the algebra in this case is obviously getting out of hand. By plugging the numbers in as you go, you can also see if your answers are making sense as you go. This problem is a field of land mines in regard to signs.

That's the line of thinking that we decided to go down in the end. And having done that, I decided to do the full algebraic expression for the final image and final magnification anyway, just to annoy the people marking it. I feel like Dr Frankenstein.
 
ConorDMK said:
That's the line of thinking that we decided to go down in the end. And having done that, I decided to do the full algebraic expression for the final image and final magnification anyway, just to annoy the people marking it. I feel like Dr Frankenstein.
:oldbiggrin:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
995
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K