- #1
greswd
- 764
- 20
I was reading this paper: http://dinamico2.unibg.it/recami/erasmo%20docs/SomeOld/RevisitingSLTsLNC1982.pdf
It is on superluminal Lorentz transformations and is too advanced for me.
But anyway, take a look at equation(s) (11). For the y' and z' transformations, there is an imaginary unit coefficient. But for the x' transformation, there is none.
So the space in the x-direction is 'real', but the transverse space around it is 'imaginary'?
It is on superluminal Lorentz transformations and is too advanced for me.
But anyway, take a look at equation(s) (11). For the y' and z' transformations, there is an imaginary unit coefficient. But for the x' transformation, there is none.
So the space in the x-direction is 'real', but the transverse space around it is 'imaginary'?