Impedance Matching Coaxial Cables

Click For Summary
To connect two coaxial cables with the same dielectric but different dimensions, the radius of the outer conductor of the second line must be calculated to achieve impedance matching. Removing the dielectric will increase the velocity of wave propagation, as the velocity is inversely related to the square root of the product of permeability and permittivity. Consequently, the characteristic impedance will also increase when the dielectric is removed. The discussion emphasizes understanding the concept of impedance matching between transmission lines of different characteristic impedances. The calculations provided suggest a radius of 12 mm for the outer conductor of the second line, but further clarification on the conceptual understanding of impedance matching is needed.
DODGEVIPER13
Messages
668
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We need to connect two coax cables with the same dielectric (εr = 9) but
with different dimensions as shown. How big must be the radius of the
outer conductor of the second line in order to match two lines?

How would the velocity of the wave propagation change, if we remove
the dielectric? What’s about the characteristic impedance?


Homework Equations


Zc=sqrt(μ/ε)((ln(b/a))/(2∏))
μ=μrμ0
ε=εrε0

The Attempt at a Solution


I so far have uploaded my answer to the radius part am I right? For the last conceptual parts I am not sure and need a bit of help.
 

Attachments

  • ImpedanceMatching.pdf
    ImpedanceMatching.pdf
    29.9 KB · Views: 287
  • Electromagnetics.png
    Electromagnetics.png
    11.6 KB · Views: 517
Physics news on Phys.org
For the conceptual part I am thinking that the velocity would decrease because Vp=C/(sqrt(με) so if the dielectric is removed the denominator will decrease and will lead to a faster propaagation. Furthermore the characteristic impedance is sqrt(μ/ε) so it will increase too.
 
First, what is implied when two transmission lines of different characteristic impedance are "matched"? In regards to the conceptual question, it looks like you have the right idea.
 
Zl=sqrt(μ/ε)(((ln(b/a))/(2∏))=sqrt(μ/ε)((ln(b2/a2))/(2∏)) so I can cancel 2 pi and sqrt(μ/ε) and both natural logs giving b1/a1=b2/a2 solving for b2 I get 12 mm is it still wrong I am lost?
 
I wasn't implying that it was wrong I was just seeing if you understood what was meant conceptually by impedance matching.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
17K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K