Impedeance of parallel RLC circuit

AI Thread Summary
The impedance of a parallel RLC circuit can be calculated by combining the complex impedances of the resistor, capacitor, and inductor using the formula 1/Z = 1/Z_R + 1/Z_C + 1/Z_L. In this context, Z_R equals R, Z_C is represented as 1/(iωC), and Z_L is iωL. This approach involves algebraic manipulation of complex numbers to derive the total impedance Z. The final result is obtained by calculating the modulus of Z, which is expressed as ||Z|| = √(a² + b²) for a complex number Z = a + bi. Understanding this method allows for effective analysis of parallel RLC circuits.
hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
The impedance of the parallel RLC circuit shown is given by (as attached)
Relevant Equations
Z = [(R^2 + (XL - Xc)^2)]^1/2
the impedance of the parallel RLC circuit is shown as attached.
The equation above is the impedeance of RLC circuit in series, how can I convert that in parallel? Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    27.2 KB · Views: 334
Physics news on Phys.org
There are duality theorems in linear passive networks like this to literally convert them to a similar system with the same solution with the equivalent of variable substitutions (resistance becomes conductance, inductances becomes capacitance, current becomes voltage, etc.). BUT, it's kind of pointless to go that route for this sort of problem. You can just combine the impedances in parallel. Same as you would do for resistors, except the component values can be complex numbers. This is essentially an algebra problem.
 
You can use the rule for parallel resistances for this case with the role of resistance played by the complex impedance so it will be $$\frac{1}{Z}=\frac{1}{Z_R}+\frac{1}{Z_C}+\frac{1}{Z_L}$$. As I emphasized these are complex impedances , for example it will be ##Z_R=R## however ##Z_C=\frac{1}{i\omega C}## and ##Z_L=i\omega L##. So you have to do algebra of complex numbers to find the complex ##Z## and then your answer will be the modulus of Z, that is ##\|Z\|##. (The modulus or magnitude of a complex number ##Z=a+bi## is the real number $$\|Z\|=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}$$.)
 
Delta2 said:
You can use the rule for parallel resistances for this case with the role of resistance played by the complex impedance so it will be $$\frac{1}{Z}=\frac{1}{Z_R}+\frac{1}{Z_C}+\frac{1}{Z_L}$$. As I emphasized these are complex impedances , for example it will be ##Z_R=R## however ##Z_C=\frac{1}{i\omega C}## and ##Z_L=i\omega L##. So you have to do algebra of complex numbers to find the complex ##Z## and then your answer will be the modulus of Z, that is ##\|Z\|##. (The modulus or magnitude of a complex number ##Z=a+bi## is the real number $$\|Z\|=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}$$.)
Thank you so much.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Back
Top