- #1
kkt21
Hi everyone, good day to you. A friend and I think that the process of writing a papers (especially in sciences and maths) are rather troublesome due to the following reason:
1. Long journal review process
2. Selection of papers to be published are not transparent, a few negative reviews can affect the decision
3. Abstracts are long winded, when a bullet form would do the job
So I have a few questions and would really appreciate your honest opinions on them :)
1. Would you be willing to let other readers review and summarise your paper? If that's okay, would you prefer only those who are qualified (with good research background) to write the review?
2. Would you help to review and summarise other authors' paper in return?
3. How would you suggest other (quantifiable) ways to recognise a good paper rather than number of citations?
Thanks for your time and I really appreciate it! It would be great if we can make the academic community more collaborative and fast-paced. Have a great day ! :D
1. Long journal review process
2. Selection of papers to be published are not transparent, a few negative reviews can affect the decision
3. Abstracts are long winded, when a bullet form would do the job
So I have a few questions and would really appreciate your honest opinions on them :)
1. Would you be willing to let other readers review and summarise your paper? If that's okay, would you prefer only those who are qualified (with good research background) to write the review?
2. Would you help to review and summarise other authors' paper in return?
3. How would you suggest other (quantifiable) ways to recognise a good paper rather than number of citations?
Thanks for your time and I really appreciate it! It would be great if we can make the academic community more collaborative and fast-paced. Have a great day ! :D