I Incomplete geodesics in a singularity, do they warrant quantum concerns?

walkeraj
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
Question: The idea of a continuum breaks down for a singularity when a geodesic become incomplete (the breaking of the idea that there was a continuous succession, where no part could be distinguished from neighboring parts, except by arbitrary division), and so with that does this indicate a scale change from classical to quantum? That is, is space-time necessarily geodesic incomplete at the quantum scale?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
walkeraj said:
Question: The idea of a continuum breaks down for a singularity when a geodesic become incomplete (the breaking of the idea that there was a continuous succession, where no part could be distinguished from neighboring parts, except by arbitrary division), and so with that does this indicate a scale change from classical to quantum? That is, is space-time necessarily geodesic incomplete at the quantum scale?
You question is not clear to me, but if you are talking about the continuity of the geodesic, then all geodesics, complete and incomplete, are continuous. If fact they are smooth as in differentiable.
 
walkeraj said:
The idea of a continuum breaks down for a singularity when a geodesic become incomplete
This is not correct. The "singularity" is not part of the manifold; the manifold itself is a perfectly valid continous open set.

The rest of your post is based on this invalid premise, and when that is corrected, your question is not well posed.
 
walkeraj said:
with that does this indicate a scale change from classical to quantum? That is, is space-time necessarily geodesic incomplete at the quantum scale?
This looks like personal speculation, which is off limits here.

This thread is now closed.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top