Inconsistencies in classical physics

In summary, the classical EM wave theory predicts that the emission of infinite energy can happen when the EM force is conservative, but quantum theory was created to correct this flaw.
  • #1
jackferry
15
0
A question I've had about the black body problem and classical physics in general has to do with the conservation of energy.

One of the first things you can derive in classical mechanics is that for a conservative force the total energy of the system doesn't change. However, one of the typical examples of the failure of classical mechanics is the prediction of infinite energy radiated by a black body radiator. My question is how the classical EM theory predicts the radiation of infinite energy when the EM force is conservative. Is there some assumption that allows for the breaking of the conservation of energy in this case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The infinite power is more like an expectation than a derived value, and it wouldn't occur with a finite object made up out of a finite number of atoms.

On the other hand, atoms don't work in classical mechanics anyway - the electrons would fall into the nucleus.
 
  • #3
jackferry said:
A question I've had about the black body problem and classical physics in general has to do with the conservation of energy.

One of the first things you can derive in classical mechanics is that for a conservative force the total energy of the system doesn't change. However, one of the typical examples of the failure of classical mechanics is the prediction of infinite energy radiated by a black body radiator. My question is how the classical EM theory predicts the radiation of infinite energy when the EM force is conservative. Is there some assumption that allows for the breaking of the conservation of energy in this case?
Classical theory is flawed. It does not work in microscopic situations or many situation for that matter. To avoid such a "breaking" of the conservation of energy, quantum physicists created the appropriate theories to tackle the problems. Quantum physics was their solution.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and Delta2
  • #4
The flaw in the classical EM wave theory is that EM energy is absorbed (or emitted) in a continuous way. This flaw might be hidden when studying other problems regarding EM waves but it shows up in the case of the black body radiation as that emitted power goes to infinity as frequency goes to infinity (while we would expect by typical reasoning and for the main reason of conservation energy that as frequency tends to infinity the emitted power would go to zero).

To correct this flaw, scientists initially suggested that EM energy is absorbed or emitted in discrete packets (photons) but travels as classical EM wave. This leads to some other difficulties as well, in order to fix all the difficulties a new theory emerged , Quantum ElectroDynamics. QED has as "a low frequency limit " the classical EM wave theory because at relatively low frequencies f the energy of the discrete energy packet (photon) is low ##E=hf## where h is plank's constant which is pretty small number, so the energy is absorbed or emitted in very small packets ##hf## could say infinitesimal packets , so it is like it happens in a continuous way, like the classical EM wave theory suggest..
 

FAQ: Inconsistencies in classical physics

1. What are the main inconsistencies in classical physics?

The main inconsistencies in classical physics involve the inability to explain certain phenomena, such as the behavior of particles at the quantum level, the constant speed of light, and the concept of absolute time and space.

2. How did the discovery of quantum mechanics challenge classical physics?

The discovery of quantum mechanics challenged classical physics by demonstrating that particles do not always behave as continuous waves, as classical physics suggests. Instead, particles can also behave as discrete packets of energy, known as quanta.

3. Why did classical physics fail to fully explain the behavior of subatomic particles?

Classical physics failed to fully explain the behavior of subatomic particles because it does not take into account the uncertainty principle, which states that the position and momentum of a particle cannot be known simultaneously. Additionally, classical physics does not account for the wave-particle duality of subatomic particles.

4. How did the theory of relativity challenge classical physics?

The theory of relativity challenged classical physics by introducing the concept of space-time and showing that the laws of physics are the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. This contradicts the classical notion of absolute time and space.

5. What advancements have been made to reconcile the inconsistencies in classical physics?

Advancements such as the development of quantum mechanics, the theory of relativity, and the unification of these theories through quantum field theory have helped to reconcile the inconsistencies in classical physics. Additionally, advancements in technology have allowed for more precise measurements and observations, leading to a better understanding of the underlying principles of the physical world.

Similar threads

Back
Top