Induced polarization for collision between conducting spheres

AI Thread Summary
Induced polarization occurs in conducting spheres due to the movement of free electrons in response to an external electric field, which alters the charge distribution on their surfaces. This polarization effectively reduces the distance between the centers of charge without changing the net charge, leading to an increase in kinetic energy as the spheres approach each other. The discussion critiques a previous explanation for lacking clarity on the role of the electric field and the ambiguous reference to the "insides" of the spheres. Participants emphasize the importance of accurately describing how electrons move to the sides facing each other, enhancing the understanding of the phenomenon. Overall, the conversation highlights the nuances of explaining induced polarization in conductive materials.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this part (b) of this problem,
1675050823659.png

The solution is,
1675050872874.png


However, would a better explanation be:

As the spheres are conductors, there will be free electrons within and on the surface of the conductors that will be polarized by the external electric field between the conductor. This will decrease the effective distance between the centers of charge (won't affect net charge of sphere; only where charge is distributed locally within the sphere). Therefore, the spheres will be closer together that ##r_1 + r_2## so more electric potential energy will be converted to kinetic energy.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In what way do you feel it is better?
What do you mean by electrons being polarised?
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016 and nasu
haruspex said:
In what way do you feel it is better?
What do you mean by electrons being polarised?
Thanks for your reply @haruspex !

I guess their solution sort of implies that the surface becomes polarized due to the electric field between the spheres. While mine, at least tried too, said that surface will become polarized due to the movement of the electrons local to the surface.

Sorry yes I now realize that I said electrons become polarized, I meant the surface. Electrons can't get polarized since they already have a finite charge ##-e## in a uniform sphere.

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
their solution sort of implies that the surface becomes polarized due to the electric field between the spheres. While mine, at least tried too, said that surface will become polarized due to the movement of the electrons local to the surface.
Reaaly? Their explanation says nothing about the field and does not use the word "polarised" but does say the electrons move - without saying why.
What I don't like is the reference to the "insides" of the spheres. Too ambiguous. I would have said that on each sphere they move to the side facing the other sphere.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
haruspex said:
Reaaly? Their explanation says nothing about the field and does not use the word "polarised" but does say the electrons move - without saying why.
What I don't like is the reference to the "insides" of the spheres. Too ambiguous. I would have said that on each sphere they move to the side facing the other sphere.
Thank you for your reply @haruspex ! I like what you pointed out about the insides of the spheres!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top