Induced Surface Current in Conducting Plane, Dropped Charge

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the induced surface current density on a grounded infinite conducting plane due to a charge released above it. For part (a), participants suggest using magnetic boundary conditions and Gauss' Law to determine the surface charge density, noting that the electric potential changes as the charge accelerates. In part (b), it is established that the magnetic force on the charge is zero due to the azimuthal symmetry of the system, which dictates that any magnetic field must align with the charge's line of fall. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between surface charge density and current density as the charge moves. Overall, the key takeaway is the connection between symmetry, induced currents, and the resulting magnetic effects on the charge.
Ichigo449
Messages
46
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


a) A charge q is released a distance d above a grounded infinite conducting plane. It's non relativistic velocity is v. Find the induced surface current density on the plane.
b) Show that the above current density produces a vanishing magnetic force on the charge.

Homework Equations


Magnetic Boundary Conditions: B_above-B_below = K_f x n.
Magnetic Force on Charge: F=qvBsinΘ

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not at all sure what to do for part a) but for b) Ampere's Law applied to a rectangle passing through the plane implies that the field is parallel to the plane so the cross product gives 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ichigo449 said:
for b) Ampere's Law applied to a rectangle passing through the plane implies that the field is parallel to the plane so the cross product gives 0.
If the B field is parallel to the plane at the location of the charge, why would the cross product of v and B yield zero?
 
Right, they would be perpendicular so one of the magnitudes needs to zero.
 
Symmetry in the system should help in determining the magnitude of B along the line of fall of the charge.
 
Which symmetry are you referring to?
 
If the system is rotated about a certain axis, there is no change in the induced surface-current distribution. So, there can be no change in the B field pattern if the system is rotated about this axis. That should tell you something about B for points on the axis of symmetry.
 
So azimuthal symmetry about the line of fall of the charge would make sense. I'm just not seeing the connection between that and zero magnetic field on the line. Is it an Amperian loop?
 
Question (b) only asks you to show that the magnetic force on the charge is zero. Azimuthal symmetry alone implies that even if B is nonzero on the axis of symmetry, it must point in a certain direction. From this direction you should be able to conclude that the force is zero.

If you want to show that B is actually zero on the axis of symmetry, you can use the Biot-Savart law along with the symmetric distribution of the current density.
 
Oh, thank you. I understand where I was going wrong now. The magnetic field will have to point along the line of fall so the force vanishes.
 
  • #10
Ichigo449 said:
Oh, thank you. I understand where I was going wrong now. The magnetic field will have to point along the line of fall so the force vanishes.
Yes, that's right.
 
  • #11
You could also use the fact if there were a magnetic force, it would necessarily be perpendicular to the velocity (i.e., perpendicular to the symmetry axis). But this force sticking out in some direction would violate the rotational symmetry.
 
  • #12
So that's part b), could I get a hint how to begin part a)? The only idea I have is to somehow use magnetic boundary conditions.
 
  • #13
Can you see a way to get the surface charge density σ on the conducting plane?
 
  • #14
If the charge wasn't moving, yes.
The logic would be that from Gauss' Law the electric field at the surface of the plane is σ/ε, which is equal to the normal derivative of the electric potential evaluated at the surface of the plane. So from the method of images the potential is the same as that due to two oppositely charged point charges.
So I suppose my real difficulty with the question is that I'm not sure how the electric potential changes when the charge is accelerating.
 
  • #15
σ at a point of the plane will depend on the distance d of the point charge from the plane. Therefore dσ/dt will depend on the velocity v of the point charge. You should be able to relate dσ/dt to the current density K.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K