Induction and the Fibonacci Sequence

  • Thread starter cragar
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Induction
In summary, the conversation is about using induction to prove the Fibonacci sequence, with a particular focus on whether to add another term or plug in k+1 in the induction step. The conversation also touches on using explicit formulas for the Fibonacci sequence and the role of induction in proving it.
  • #1
cragar
2,552
3

Homework Statement


If i want to use induction to prove the Fibonacci sequence I first check that 0 satisfies both sides of the equation. then i assume its true for n=k then show that it for works for n=k+1

The Attempt at a Solution


But I am a little confused if i should add another term or just plug in k+1
so the Fibonacci sequence is [itex] F_{n}=F_{n-1}+F_{n-2} [/itex]
so then should k+1 be [itex] F_{k+1}= F_{k}+F_{k-1}+F_{k-2} [/itex]
or should it be[itex] F_{k+1}=F_{k}+F_{k-1} [/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Of course, you 'plug in' k+1. You don't add another term. It's not exactly clear what you are trying to prove here.
 
  • #3
ok for example if we have 1+2+3+4+...n= n(n+1)/2
ow we assume its true for n=k and then plug in k=k+1 but on the left side we add the k+1 term to to previous sequence but on the right we plug in k+1
so we get 1+2+3+4+...k+(k+1)=(k+1)(k+1+1)/2
but with the Fibonacci sequence It seems a little strange to me
do i just add the next term or plug k+1 into all the terms?
 
  • #4
cragar said:
ok for example if we have 1+2+3+4+...n= n(n+1)/2
ow we assume its true for n=k and then plug in k=k+1 but on the left side we add the k+1 term to to previous sequence but on the right we plug in k+1
so we get 1+2+3+4+...k+(k+1)=(k+1)(k+1+1)/2
but with the Fibonacci sequence It seems a little strange to me
do i just add the next term or plug k+1 into all the terms?

This all depends on what you are trying to prove. In this example, the left side is a sum, so sure, to go to the n+1 case you need to add a term. The right side is the formula for the sum, so to go to the n+1 case you change n to n+1. What exactly are you trying to prove about the Fibonacci sequence??
 
  • #5
ok so the Fibonacci sequence is
[itex] F_{n}= \frac{a^{n+1}-b^{n+1}}{w} [/itex]
so F_n is the formula for the sequence and a,b,w are fixed numbers and n is any integer and I am trying to prove the sequence with induction only I am not sure where to put the n+1
 
  • #6
cragar said:
ok so the Fibonacci sequence is
[itex] F_{n}= \frac{a^{n+1}-b^{n+1}}{w} [/itex]
so F_n is the formula for the sequence and a,b,w are fixed numbers and n is any integer and I am trying to prove the sequence with induction only I am not sure where to put the n+1

Ok, so you are talking about an explicit formula for the Fibonacci sequence. You put x^(n+1) into the recurrence relation for the Fibonacci sequence. You'll get a quadatic formula for value of x which has two solutions, call them a and b. Find them. Then you know c*a^(n+1)+d*b^(n+1) also satisfies the recurrence relation for any c and d. Now use the initial conditions F_0=1 and F_1=1 to fix c and d. There's really no 'induction' in this derivation. I think it would be really awkward to try to show this by induction.
 

FAQ: Induction and the Fibonacci Sequence

What is induction?

Induction is a scientific method of reasoning in which general principles or laws are derived from particular instances or observations.

How does induction differ from deduction?

Induction involves making generalizations based on observations, while deduction involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or laws.

What is the process of induction?

The process of induction typically involves making observations, identifying patterns or trends, and then formulating a hypothesis to explain those patterns. The hypothesis is then tested through further observations and experiments to determine its validity.

What are the limitations of induction?

Induction can only provide probabilistic conclusions, meaning that the generalizations or laws derived from it are not necessarily always true. Additionally, induction relies on the assumption that the future will resemble the past, which is not always the case.

Can induction be used in all scientific fields?

Induction can be used in many scientific fields, but it may be more applicable in some fields than others. For example, it is commonly used in fields such as biology, psychology, and sociology, but may be less applicable in fields such as physics or mathematics.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
992
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top