Induction for divisibility by 10

In summary, we have proven by induction that for every n∈N, 34n+2 +1 is divisible by 10. This is shown by first establishing the base case and then using the induction hypothesis to prove the inequality for n = k+1. By using the recursive definition, we have shown that the inequality holds for all natural numbers n.
  • #1
KOO
19
0
Show that for every n∈N, 34n+2 +1 is divisible by 10

Prove by Induction.


Attempt)

Base Case: n = 1, 3(4(1)+2) + 1 = 730
So the base case holds true.

Assume that the inequality holds for n = k

34k+2 +1 is divisible by 10

Show true for n = k+1

34(k+1)+2 + 1
34k+4+2 + 1
34 * 34k+2 + 1
81 * 34k+2 + 1
(80+1) * 34k+2 + 1
80(34k+2) + 34k+2 + 1

80(34k+2) + 34k+2 + 1 is divisible by 10 according to our induction hypotheses.What next?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
KOO said:
Show that for every n∈N, 34n+2 +1 is divisible by 10

Prove by Induction.


Attempt)

Base Case: n = 1, 3(4(1)+2) + 1 = 730
So the base case holds true.

Assume that the inequality holds for n = k

34k+2 +1 is divisible by 10

Show true for n = k+1

34(k+1)+2 + 1
34k+4+2 + 1
34 * 34k+2 + 1
81 * 34k+2 + 1
(80+1) * 34k+2 + 1
80(34k+2) + 34k+2 + 1

80(34k+2) + 34k+2 + 1 is divisible by 10 according to our induction hypotheses.What next?

\(\displaystyle 3^{4k+2}=3^{2(2k+1)}=9^{2k+1}=(10-1)^{2k+1}\)
Regards,
\(\displaystyle |\pi\rangle\)
 
  • #3
Hi KOO! :)

Let me continue from one of your expressions:
\begin{aligned}
81 \cdot 3^{4k+2} +1
&= 81 \cdot \left(3^{4k+2} + 1\right) - 81 + 1 \\
&= 81 \cdot \left(3^{4k+2} + 1\right) - 80
\end{aligned}

Both $\left(3^{4k+2} + 1\right)$ and $80$ are divisible by $10$...
 
  • #4
Re: Induction:

I would make my induction hypothesis $P_k$ be:

\(\displaystyle 3^{4k+2}+1=10m_k\) where \(\displaystyle m_k\in\mathbb{N}\)

Next, as my inductive step, I would look at:

\(\displaystyle \left(3^{4(k+1)+2}+1 \right)-\left(3^{4k+2}+1 \right)=3^{4k+2}\left(3^4-1 \right)=80\cdot3^{4k+2}\)

Adding this to $P_k$, we find:

\(\displaystyle 3^{4(k+1)+2}+1=10m_k+80\cdot3^{4k+2}=10\left(m_k+8\cdot3^{4k+2} \right)\)

If we use the recursive definition:

\(\displaystyle m_{k+1}=m_k+8\cdot3^{4k+2}\) where \(\displaystyle m_1=730\)

then we may write:

\(\displaystyle 3^{4(k+1)+2}+1=10m_{k+1}\)

Thus, we have derived $P_{k+1}$ from $P_k$ thereby completing the proof by induction.
 
  • #5


Next, we can use the fact that if a number is divisible by 10, then it is also divisible by 2 and 5. Therefore, we can rewrite the expression as:

80(34k+2) + 34k+2 + 1 = (2*40)(34k+2) + (5*6)(34k+2) + 1

This shows that the expression is a multiple of both 2 and 5, and therefore it is also divisible by 10.

Hence, by the principle of mathematical induction, we can conclude that for every n∈N, 34n+2 +1 is divisible by 10.
 

FAQ: Induction for divisibility by 10

How does induction work for proving divisibility by 10?

Induction is a mathematical proof technique that involves proving a statement for a base case and then showing that if the statement holds for a specific case, it also holds for the next case. For proving divisibility by 10, we first show that the statement holds for the base case of 10. Then, we assume that it holds for a number n and use this assumption to prove that it also holds for n+10. This proves that the statement holds for all numbers that are multiples of 10.

Can induction be used to prove divisibility by numbers other than 10?

Yes, induction can be used to prove divisibility for any number. The process is the same as for proving divisibility by 10, but the base case and assumptions would be based on the specific number being proven for divisibility.

What is the importance of using induction for proving divisibility by 10?

Using induction for proving divisibility by 10 provides a systematic and rigorous way to prove the statement for all multiples of 10. It also allows us to generalize the proof for any number, making it a powerful tool in mathematics.

Can induction be used to prove divisibility for non-integer numbers?

No, induction is a proof technique that is only applicable for integers. Divisibility is defined for integers, so induction cannot be used to prove divisibility for non-integer numbers.

Are there any limitations to using induction for proving divisibility by 10?

One limitation of using induction for proving divisibility by 10 is that it only works for numbers that are multiples of 10. It cannot be used to prove divisibility for numbers that are not multiples of 10. Additionally, the base case must be explicitly stated and proven, which can be challenging for some statements.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top