MHB Induction Prove: Making Fractions 1/2 to 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter cshao123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that all fractions between 1/2 and 1 can be generated starting from the fraction 1/1 using two specific rules. The first rule allows the transformation of a fraction a/b in lowest terms to b/2a, while the second rule permits the combination of two fractions a/b and c/d in lowest terms to create (a+c)/(b+d). By applying these rules iteratively, one can derive all fractions within the specified range. The thread also notes its similarity to an existing discussion on the same topic, leading to its closure. The proof demonstrates the versatility of fraction manipulation through these defined operations.
cshao123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Suppose you begin with the fraction 1/1. There are 2 rules: a)If you can make a fraction a/b where a/b is in its lowest terms, then you can also make b/2a. b)If you can make a/b and c/d where they are both in lowest terms, you can also make (a+c)/(b+d).

Prove that you can make all fractions between and including 1/2 and 1.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is a virtual duplicate of the thread found https://mathhelpboards.com/pre-calculus-21/fractions-can-you-make-proof-23555.html. Thread closed.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top