MHB Inequality Challenge: Prove $x^x \ge (x+1/2)^{x+1}$ for $x>0$

AI Thread Summary
The inequality \( x^x \ge \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1} \) for \( x > 0 \) can be proven by analyzing the function \( f(x) = x^x - \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1} \). Taking the logarithm and differentiating leads to the conclusion that \( \ln f(x) \) has a minimum at \( x = 1 \), where \( f(1) = 0 \), thus confirming \( f(x) \geq 0 \) for all \( x > 0 \). An alternative proof using Jensen's Inequality demonstrates that the convexity of \( f(x) = x \ln x \) supports the original inequality. Both methods validate that \( x^x \) is indeed greater than or equal to \( \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1} \) for positive \( x \).
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove $$x^x \ge \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1}$$ for $x>0$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Prove $$x^x \ge \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1}$$ for $x>0$.
[sp]We want to show that $f(x) = x^x - \bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1} \geqslant0$ for all $x>0$. Take logs, then differentiate: $$\ln f(x) = x\ln x - (x+1)\ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr),$$ $$\tfrac d{dx}(\ln f(x)) = \ln x + 1 - \ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr) - 1 = \ln\bigl( \tfrac{2x}{x+1} \bigr).$$ But $\ln\bigl( \frac{2x}{x+1} \bigr)$ is zero when $x=1$, negative when $x<1$ and positive when $x>1$. Thus $\ln(f(x))$ has a minimum value when $x=1$, hence so does $f(x)$. But $f(1) = 0$. Therefore $f(x)\geqslant0$ for all $x>0$, as required.[/sp]
Edit. Oops! Anemone kindly points out a grotesque blunder in the way I presented that argument. Here is what I should have said.
[sp]Notice that $x^x \geqslant \bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1}$ is equivalent to $\dfrac{x^x}{\bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1}} \geqslant 1$. Take logs to see that this in turn is equivalent to $x\ln x - (x+1)\ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr) \geqslant0$. That can be proved as in my attempt above.[/sp]
 
Last edited:
Opalg said:
[sp]We want to show that $f(x) = x^x - \bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1} \geqslant0$ for all $x>0$. Take logs, then differentiate: $$\ln f(x) = x\ln x - (x+1)\ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr),$$ $$\tfrac d{dx}(\ln f(x)) = \ln x + 1 - \ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr) - 1 = \ln\bigl( \tfrac{2x}{x+1} \bigr).$$ But $\ln\bigl( \frac{2x}{x+1} \bigr)$ is zero when $x=1$, negative when $x<1$ and positive when $x>1$. Thus $\ln(f(x))$ has a minimum value when $x=1$, hence so does $f(x)$. But $f(1) = 0$. Therefore $f(x)\geqslant0$ for all $x>0$, as required.[/sp]
Edit. Oops! Anemone kindly points out a grotesque blunder in the way I presented that argument. Here is what I should have said.
[sp]Notice that $x^x \geqslant \bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1}$ is equivalent to $\dfrac{x^x}{\bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1}} \geqslant 1$. Take logs to see that this in turn is equivalent to $x\ln x - (x+1)\ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr) \geqslant0$. That can be proved as in my attempt above.[/sp]

Hi Opalg,

Thanks for participating and I want to show you and those who read this thread another method (a method proposed by other) to prove this inequality using the Jensen Inequality...

Let $$f(x)=x \ln x$$

Differentiate the function of f of x twice we got $$f''(x)=\frac{1}{x} (>0) $$ for all $x$.

This means $f(x)$ is a convex function in the domain $x>0$ and Jensen inequality tells us if a function is convex, we have

$$f\left( \frac{\sum x_i}{n}\right) \le \frac{\sum f(x_i)}{n}$$

$$f\left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \le \frac{f(x)+f(1)}{2}$$

$$\left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \ln \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \le \frac{x\ln x+1 \ln 1}{2}$$

$$\left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \ln \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \le \frac{x\ln x}{2}$$

$$\cancel{2}\left( \frac{x+1}{\cancel{2}}\right) \ln \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \le x\ln x$$

$$ \ln \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right)^{x+1} \le \ln x^x$$

$$\therefore x^x \ge \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right)^{x+1}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top