Inequality Challenge: Prove $x^x \ge (x+1/2)^{x+1}$ for $x>0$

In summary, we can prove the inequality $x^x \ge \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1}$ for $x>0$ using either the method of taking logs and differentiating or using the Jensen inequality. Both methods lead to the same conclusion that the inequality holds for all values of $x>0$.
  • #1
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
3,883
115
Prove \(\displaystyle x^x \ge \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1}\) for $x>0$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
anemone said:
Prove \(\displaystyle x^x \ge \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1}\) for $x>0$.
[sp]We want to show that $f(x) = x^x - \bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1} \geqslant0$ for all $x>0$. Take logs, then differentiate: $$\ln f(x) = x\ln x - (x+1)\ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr),$$ $$\tfrac d{dx}(\ln f(x)) = \ln x + 1 - \ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr) - 1 = \ln\bigl( \tfrac{2x}{x+1} \bigr).$$ But $\ln\bigl( \frac{2x}{x+1} \bigr)$ is zero when $x=1$, negative when $x<1$ and positive when $x>1$. Thus $\ln(f(x))$ has a minimum value when $x=1$, hence so does $f(x)$. But $f(1) = 0$. Therefore $f(x)\geqslant0$ for all $x>0$, as required.[/sp]
Edit. Oops! Anemone kindly points out a grotesque blunder in the way I presented that argument. Here is what I should have said.
[sp]Notice that $x^x \geqslant \bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1}$ is equivalent to $\dfrac{x^x}{\bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1}} \geqslant 1$. Take logs to see that this in turn is equivalent to $x\ln x - (x+1)\ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr) \geqslant0$. That can be proved as in my attempt above.[/sp]
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Opalg said:
[sp]We want to show that $f(x) = x^x - \bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1} \geqslant0$ for all $x>0$. Take logs, then differentiate: $$\ln f(x) = x\ln x - (x+1)\ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr),$$ $$\tfrac d{dx}(\ln f(x)) = \ln x + 1 - \ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr) - 1 = \ln\bigl( \tfrac{2x}{x+1} \bigr).$$ But $\ln\bigl( \frac{2x}{x+1} \bigr)$ is zero when $x=1$, negative when $x<1$ and positive when $x>1$. Thus $\ln(f(x))$ has a minimum value when $x=1$, hence so does $f(x)$. But $f(1) = 0$. Therefore $f(x)\geqslant0$ for all $x>0$, as required.[/sp]
Edit. Oops! Anemone kindly points out a grotesque blunder in the way I presented that argument. Here is what I should have said.
[sp]Notice that $x^x \geqslant \bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1}$ is equivalent to $\dfrac{x^x}{\bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1}} \geqslant 1$. Take logs to see that this in turn is equivalent to $x\ln x - (x+1)\ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr) \geqslant0$. That can be proved as in my attempt above.[/sp]

Hi Opalg,

Thanks for participating and I want to show you and those who read this thread another method (a method proposed by other) to prove this inequality using the Jensen Inequality...

Let \(\displaystyle f(x)=x \ln x\)

Differentiate the function of f of x twice we got \(\displaystyle f''(x)=\frac{1}{x} (>0) \) for all $x$.

This means $f(x)$ is a convex function in the domain $x>0$ and Jensen inequality tells us if a function is convex, we have

\(\displaystyle f\left( \frac{\sum x_i}{n}\right) \le \frac{\sum f(x_i)}{n}\)

\(\displaystyle f\left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \le \frac{f(x)+f(1)}{2}\)

\(\displaystyle \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \ln \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \le \frac{x\ln x+1 \ln 1}{2}\)

\(\displaystyle \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \ln \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \le \frac{x\ln x}{2}\)

\(\displaystyle \cancel{2}\left( \frac{x+1}{\cancel{2}}\right) \ln \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \le x\ln x\)

\(\displaystyle \ln \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right)^{x+1} \le \ln x^x\)

\(\displaystyle \therefore x^x \ge \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right)^{x+1}\)
 

FAQ: Inequality Challenge: Prove $x^x \ge (x+1/2)^{x+1}$ for $x>0$

What is the "Inequality Challenge"?

The "Inequality Challenge" refers to the mathematical inequality that states that for any positive value of x, the value of x to the power of x is greater than or equal to the value of x plus one-half to the power of x plus one. This can be expressed as x^x ≥ (x+1/2)^(x+1).

Why is it important to prove this inequality?

Proving this inequality is important because it has various applications in mathematics, economics, and other fields. It helps to understand the relationship between exponential and polynomial functions and can be used to solve various problems involving growth rates, optimization, and probability.

How can this inequality be proven?

This inequality can be proven using various mathematical techniques, such as induction, differentiation, and logarithmic functions. One possible approach is to use the fact that the derivative of x^x is always greater than or equal to 1, and the derivative of (x+1/2)^(x+1) is always less than or equal to 1, and then using the Mean Value Theorem to show that x^x ≥ (x+1/2)^(x+1) for all values of x > 0.

Are there any exceptions to this inequality?

No, there are no exceptions to this inequality. It holds true for all positive values of x. This can be proven by considering various values of x and showing that the inequality holds for each of them.

What are some real-life applications of this inequality?

This inequality has various real-life applications, such as in finance and economics for calculating compound interest, in biology for modeling population growth, and in computer science for analyzing algorithms and data structures. It can also be used to solve optimization problems and to understand the behavior of exponential and polynomial functions.

Back
Top