Inertia: blocks attached to rod of negligible mass

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the moment of inertia (I) for small blocks with mass m attached to a rod of negligible mass. The initial formula proposed is I = m(0.5L)^2 + m(0.5L)^2, leading to I = 0.5L^2 m. Participants clarify that the moment of inertia should not be expressed in meters and emphasize the importance of correctly identifying the mass distribution. A mistake in the placement of variables is noted, highlighting the need for careful notation to avoid errors. Ultimately, the calculation is confirmed to be correct after addressing these concerns.
cantgetno
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Small blocks, each with mass m, are clamped at the ends and at the center of a rod of length L and negligible mass.
Find the formula for I


Homework Equations


I=MR^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I=m(0.5 L)^2 + m(0.5 L)^2
I=2(0.5L)^2 m
I=0.5L^2 m

am i right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi cantgetno! :smile:
cantgetno said:
Small blocks, each with mass m, are clamped at the ends and at the center of a rod of length L and negligible mass.
Find the formula for I

I=m(0.5 L)^2 + m(0.5 L)^2
I=2(0.5L)^2 m
I=0.5L^2 m

am i right?

mmm …

i] moment of inertia isn't measured in metres

ii] about which point is I being measured?

iii] what about the mass in the middle? :wink:
 


oh its around the middle
so that makes the mass in the middle mass x 0

metres? m=mass
 
cantgetno said:
oh its around the middle
so that makes the mass in the middle mass x 0

metres? m=mass

D'oh! m is mass … should have spotted that! :redface:

In that case, everything is fine. :biggrin:
 


oh crap
i put 1/2 l m^2 ... I am an idiot

thanks anyway
 
cantgetno said:
oh crap
i put 1/2 l m^2 ... I am an idiot

hee hee :biggrin:

Useful tip: keep your m's in the same place :wink:

for some reason, you shifted them from the left to the right …
I=m(0.5 L)^2 + m(0.5 L)^2
I=2(0.5L)^2 m
… which makes it much easier to make a mistake, and much less easy to spot a mistake. :cry:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
941
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
16K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K