Infinite number of polarisers (Malus's law)

In summary: Can you generalize the expression for the maximum possible intensity of light that can be transmitted through n polarizers between the given two polarizers? In summary, the problem asks for an expression for the maximum possible intensity of light that can be transmitted through n polarizers between two given polarizers. Using Malus's law, we can determine that the transmission axes of the middle polarizers should be divided evenly to achieve maximum transmission. By analyzing the intensity at different values of n, we can see a pattern and generalize the expression as I = \frac{1}{2}I_0\cos^{2n}(45^{\circ}).
  • #1
Raphisonfire
6
0
My problem:
"Imagine you have two identical perfect linear polarisers and a source of natural light. Place them one behind the other and position their transmission axes at 0° and 90° respectively. If 1000 W.m-2 of randomly polarised light is incident.

Determine an expression for the maximum possible intensity of light that can be transmitted through if you insert ‘n’ polarisers between them."

I understand that I need to be using, Malus's law which is...
[tex] I_θ = I_0 Cos(θ_n)^2[/tex]

My attempt:

I know that the first and last polariser transmission axes must be at 0° and 90°, I know how to write the expression out... eg. [tex] I_θ = I_0 Cos(θ_1)^2 Cos(θ_2)^2... Cos(θ_∞)^2[/tex] But I am just not sure how to generalize the expression.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Raphisonfire said:
My problem:
"Imagine you have two identical perfect linear polarisers and a source of natural light. Place them one behind the other and position their transmission axes at 0° and 90° respectively. If 1000 W.m-2 of randomly polarised light is incident.

Determine an expression for the maximum possible intensity of light that can be transmitted through if you insert ‘n’ polarisers between them."

I understand that I need to be using, Malus's law which is...
[tex] I_θ = I_0 Cos(θ_n)^2[/tex]

My attempt:

I know that the first and last polariser transmission axes must be at 0° and 90°, I know how to write the expression out... eg. [tex] I_θ = I_0 Cos(θ_1)^2 Cos(θ_2)^2... Cos(θ_∞)^2[/tex] But I am just not sure how to generalize the expression.
I'll try to get you started.

I don't think the problem is actually asking about an infinite number of polarizers. It's just asking for n polarizers (plus the two given polarizers on each end), where n is some arbitrary natural number (and can be finite).

Here are some hints that I promised to get you started.
  • The light's intensity after the first polarizer is [itex] \frac{1}{2}I_0 [/itex], where [itex] I_0 [/itex] is the original intensity. That's because the original light is unpolarized.
  • Now let's start adding polarizers in between the two given ones. The problem statement said that the transmission axes should be such that the maximum possible intensity gets through the system. That means that you need to adjust the transmission axes of the polarizers in the middle such that the total of 90o of rotation is divided up evenly between them. In other words, if you add 1 polarizer, its angle should be 45o. If you add two polarizers, the angles should be at 30o and 60o, and so on.
  • Let's start with 1 polarizer (n = 1). Remember, the intensity after the first polarizer is [itex] \frac{1}{2}I_0 [/itex]. That intensity is then reduced by a factor of [itex] \cos^2(45^{\circ}) [/itex] by the middle polarizer. Finally, the intensity is reduced by another factor of [itex] \cos^2(90^{\circ} - 45^{\circ}) = \cos^2(45^{\circ})[/itex] by the last polarizer. So the final intensity in this case is [itex] I = \frac{1}{2}I_0\cos^2(45^{\circ})\cos^2(45^{\circ}) = \frac{1}{2}I_0 \cos^4(45^{\circ}) [/itex]

Now try it with n = 2. Then n = 3. Do you see a pattern forming?
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Infinite number of polarisers (Malus's law)

What is an infinite number of polarisers?

An infinite number of polarisers refers to a theoretical scenario in which an infinite number of polarising filters are placed in succession. This is commonly used in the context of Malus's law, a fundamental law of physics that describes the relationship between the intensity of polarised light and the angle of the polariser.

How does Malus's law apply to an infinite number of polarisers?

Malus's law states that the intensity of polarised light passing through a polariser is proportional to the cosine squared of the angle between the polarisation direction of the light and the axis of the polariser. This law applies to an infinite number of polarisers by considering the cumulative effect of each polariser on the intensity of the light passing through.

What is the purpose of using an infinite number of polarisers?

The purpose of using an infinite number of polarisers is to create a theoretical model for understanding the behavior of polarised light. By considering the cumulative effect of an infinite number of polarisers, we can better understand the relationship between the intensity of polarised light and the angle of the polariser, as described by Malus's law.

Is it possible to have an infinite number of polarisers in reality?

No, it is not possible to have an infinite number of polarisers in reality. This is a theoretical concept used in physics to simplify and understand the behavior of polarised light. In actuality, there is a limit to how many polarisers can be placed in succession before the intensity of the light becomes too low to be detected.

How does an infinite number of polarisers affect the intensity of the light?

An infinite number of polarisers will result in a decrease in the intensity of the light passing through. This is because each polariser blocks a portion of the light, and as the number of polarisers increases, the amount of light passing through decreases. This phenomenon is described by Malus's law, which states that the intensity of polarised light passing through a polariser is directly proportional to the cosine squared of the angle between the polarisation direction of the light and the axis of the polariser.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top