Insight needed into electromagnetism problem

In summary, the problem involves a stationary charge encountering an electromagnetic wave with a vector potential in the y-direction and a zero scalar potential. The question is why the y-velocity is not a more complicated function, and specifically, why the y-velocity equation does not include any effects from the magnetic field. After determining the equations of motion and correcting for a typo in the direction of the vector potential, it is suggested that considering the x-dependence of time may provide insight into the y-motion.
  • #1
Finestructure
5
0
The problem (From Electromagnetism by Pollack and Stump, exercise 11.34)
A stationary charge of charge e and mass m encounters a electromagnetic wave with vector potential

[tex]\vec{A}=\vec{j}f(x-ct)[/tex]

where
[tex]\vec{j}[/tex]

is the unit vector in the y-direction. The scalar potential is zero.
What are the components of the velocity, as a function of time,

[tex]v_{x}, v_{y},v_{z}[/tex] ?

What I´m asking for is some insight into why the y-velocity is not a more complicated function. The y-velocity is:

[tex]v_{y}=\frac{e}{m}f(x-ct)[/tex]

More specifically, when the charge is stationary, it will begin to move in the y-direction because of the changing vector potential but the motion in the y-direction will result in the magnetic field causing a motion in the x-direction which in turn should (?) effect the y-velocity, but apparently it does not. Why?
I wrote the equations of motion but they don´t seem to give any insight into the y-motion. I determined the equations of motion by starting with the following equations:

[tex]\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial A}{\partial t}[/tex]

(In the equation above, A is a vector)

[tex]\vec{B}=\nabla X \vec{A} [/tex]

[tex]\vec{F}=e(\vec{E}+\vec{v}X\vec{B})[/tex]

The function f(x-ct) isn´t a problem if we use the chain rule

w = x -ct

[tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}=\frac{df}{dw}\frac{\partial w}{\partial t}=-c\frac{df}{dw} [/tex]

likewise,

[tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=\frac{df}{dw}\frac{\partial w}{\partial x}=\frac{df}{dw} [/tex]

Note, I´ve been a little sloppy about notation regarding partials and full derivatives.
The resulting equations of motion are:

[tex]\frac{dv_{x}}{dt}=\frac{e}{m}v_{y}\frac{df}{dw}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dv_{y}}{dt}=\frac{e}{m}(c\frac{df}{dw}-v_{x}\frac{df}{dw})[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dv_{z}}{dt}=0[/tex]

Thus the z-component of the velocity is zero since it started at rest.

The equations do give the right answer for the x-velocity if I assume the value of the y-velocity. But they aren´t helpful in giving me the y-velocity. Note that the two equations involving vy and vx have an additional unknown df/dw. I´ve tried everything, even eliminating df/dw and getting an equation that appears to have just x-dependence on one side and y-dependence on the other which one could solve by setting each to a constant but that doesn´t seem to work either.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You have your vector potential pointing in the z direction so the electric field points in the z direction also, yes? How is the acceleration in the z direction zero then? Also, the magnetic field is in the y direction, so the y velocity can't be affected by either the electric or magnetic field, right?

I think you have some confusion about which way everything is pointing though I suspect this is just a typographical error.

Here is a hint for when you sort it all out: what is [tex] \frac{d}{dt} f(x(t)-ct) [/tex]?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Thank you so much for your reply, Physics Monkey.

You are correct about the direction of the vector potential, I made a mistake in its direction. It should be in the y-direction and I've edited my original post to correct it.

I've also gone back and replaced full derivatives which should have been partial derivatives. I think the derivatives for the velocity components should be full derivatives.

I have a feeling that you may be right about considering the x-dependence of time because when the charge does move in the x-direction, it no longer "feels" the same field and this might account for the charge not experiencing further effects in the y-direction due to motion in the x-direction.

Thanks again.
 

FAQ: Insight needed into electromagnetism problem

What is electromagnetism and why is it important?

Electromagnetism is the branch of physics that deals with the interaction between electrically charged particles and their surrounding electromagnetic fields. It is important because it is the foundation of many modern technologies, including electricity, magnetism, and telecommunications.

What are the fundamental principles of electromagnetism?

The fundamental principles of electromagnetism include Coulomb's Law, which describes the force between two electrically charged particles; Gauss's Law, which relates the electric field to the charge distribution; and Faraday's Law, which explains the relationship between changing magnetic fields and induced electric fields.

How does electromagnetism affect our daily lives?

Electromagnetism has a significant impact on our daily lives. It allows us to use electronic devices, power our homes and businesses, and communicate through various technologies such as radios, televisions, and cell phones. It also plays a crucial role in medical imaging, transportation, and many other aspects of modern society.

What are some real-world applications of electromagnetism?

Some real-world applications of electromagnetism include electric motors and generators, electromagnets used in MRI machines, electromagnetic waves used in radio and television communication, and the use of electromagnetic fields in particle accelerators for scientific research.

How does electromagnetism relate to other areas of science?

Electromagnetism is closely related to other areas of science, such as quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and relativity. It also has connections to other branches of physics, including mechanics, optics, and astronomy. Many scientific advancements and discoveries in one area often have implications for electromagnetism and vice versa.

Similar threads

Back
Top