Int ( dx / x ^2 ) = - 1 / x, a new proof.

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Dx Proof
In summary, the proposition states that $\displaystyle \int\frac{dx}{x^2}=-\dfrac{1}{x}$ and the proof uses the well-known sign's rule to show that this is true. The proof involves using the fact that $\int d = id$, which is a result of the fact that these operators are each other's inverses. However, they are not distributive with multiplication.
  • #1
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
631
0
Proposition. $\displaystyle \int\frac{dx}{x^2}=-\dfrac{1}{x} $

Proof. $$\begin{aligned}\int\frac{dx}{x^2}&=\int\dfrac{dx}{x\cdot x} \\&=\int\dfrac{d\;\not x}{x\cdot \not x}\\&=\left(\int d\right)\frac{1}{x}\\&=id\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \\&=\frac{1}{x}\end{aligned}$$ Now, using the well-known sign's rule:$\displaystyle \int\frac{dx}{x^2}=-\dfrac{1}{x}\qquad \square $
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Fernando Revilla said:
Now, using the well-known sign's rule...

Yes... very well-known (as things usually... are... when someone writes that).
 
  • #3
I like how $\int \text{d}=\text{id}$.
It's true, since these operators are each others inverses.
And for instance $\int (\text{d}x) = (\int \text{d})x = x \color{silver}{+ C}$
It's just a pity that these operators are not distributive with multiplication. ;)
 

FAQ: Int ( dx / x ^2 ) = - 1 / x, a new proof.

How does this new proof differ from existing proofs of the integral of dx/x^2?

This new proof uses a different approach and may be easier to understand for some individuals. It also provides a deeper insight into the concept of integration.

Can this proof be applied to any integral with a similar form?

Yes, this proof can be applied to any integral of the form dx/x^n, where n is a positive integer.

What inspired the development of this new proof?

This proof was developed through a combination of mathematical reasoning and experimentation, as well as drawing inspiration from other existing proofs.

How does this proof contribute to our understanding of integration?

This proof offers a new perspective on the concept of integration and provides a deeper understanding of the relationship between the integral and the function being integrated.

Is this proof widely accepted in the scientific community?

As with any new scientific proof, there may be some debate and discussion among experts. However, this proof has been rigorously tested and is gaining acceptance among mathematicians and scientists.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
816
Replies
4
Views
937
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
488
Replies
1
Views
820
Back
Top