MHB Integer Solutions for $4x+y+4\sqrt{xy}-28\sqrt{x}-14\sqrt{y}+48=0$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Find all integer solutions to the equation $4x+y+4\sqrt{xy}-28\sqrt{x}-14\sqrt{y}+48=0$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
From the given equation we get

$\begin{align*}(2\sqrt{x})^2+2(2\sqrt{x})\sqrt{y}+(\sqrt{y})^2-28\sqrt{x}-14\sqrt{y}+48&=0\\ (2\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{y})^2-14(2\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{y})+48&=0\\ (2\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{y}-6)(2\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{y}-8)&=0\end{align*}$

Thus, $2\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{y}=6$ or $2\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{y}=8$. The first of these equations is satisfied by the integer pairs $(x,\,y)\in {(0,\,36),\,(1,\,16),\,(4,\,4),\,(9,\,0)}$ and the second is satisfied by $(x,\,y)\in {(0,\,64),\,(1,\,36),\,(4,\,16),\,(9,\,4),\,(16,\,0)}$.

Thus the complete solution set is

${(0,\,36),\,(1,\,16),\,(4,\,4),\,(9,\,0),\,(0,\,64),\,(1,\,36),\,(4,\,16),\,(9,\,4),\,(16,\,0)}$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top