MHB Integral Notation of an exponential Brownian motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the integral notation of exponential Brownian motion, specifically comparing two forms of the integral: one with the differential element $ds$ preceding the exponential term and the other with it following. It is clarified that both notations are equivalent in meaning. References to quantum mechanics texts are provided as examples where similar notation is used. Additionally, the scaling property of Brownian motion is mentioned, emphasizing that the transformation maintains the standard properties of Brownian motion. Understanding these notations is essential for grasping the mathematical framework in stochastic processes.
gnob
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Good day!

I am reading the paper of Marc Yor (www.jstor.org/stable/1427477). equation (1.a) seems unfamiliar to me since the $ds$ comes first before the exponential part;
$$
\int_0^t ds \exp(aB_s + bs).
$$
Can you please help me clarify if there is a difference with the above notation as compared to if I write it this way:
$$
\int_0^t \exp(aB_s + bs) ds.
$$
Please give me some reference (books) on this. thanks

Secondly, how does the scaling property applied to (1.a) to become
$$
\int_0^t ds \exp 2(B_s + vs).
$$
Thanks a lot for your response. I know that the Brownian scaling states that if $B_s$ is a standard Brownian motion, then $\sqrt{c}B_{cs}$ is also a standard Brownian motion.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
gnob said:
Good day!

I am reading the paper of Marc Yor (www.jstor.org/stable/1427477). equation (1.a) seems unfamiliar to me since the $ds$ comes first before the exponential part;
$$
\int_0^t ds \exp(aB_s + bs).
$$
Can you please help me clarify if there is a difference with the above notation as compared to if I write it this way:
$$
\int_0^t \exp(aB_s + bs) ds.
$$
Please give me some reference (books) on this. thanks


Hi gnob, :)

Yes they do mean the same thing. I have seen this notation used in quantum mechanics books such as,

1) Modern Quantum Mechanics by J. Sakurai

2) Quantum Physics by S. Gasiorowicz

3) Quantum Mechanics by C.C. Tannoudji

Also a brief description about the two notations can be found >>here<<.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top