Integral (using complex analysis)

In summary, the conversation discusses a proof for the integral \int_0^{\infty}\frac{t^a}{t^b+1}dt=\frac{\pi}{b}\csc\left[\frac{\pi}{b}(a+1)\right] for -1<Re(a)<Re(b)-1. The approach involves integrating along a positively oriented keyhole contour and calculating residues at points where the denominator has order 1 poles. The user suggests double checking calculations and considering alternative methods for solving the integral.
  • #1
Texxor22
1
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to prove that [tex]\int_0^{\infty}\frac{t^a}{t^b+1}dt=\frac{\pi}{b}\csc\left[\frac{\pi}{b}(a+1)\right][/tex] for -1<Re(a)<Re(b)-1.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I integrated [tex]z^a/(z^b+1)[/tex] along a positively oriented keyhole contour C. As I took the outer circle's radius to infinity and the inner circle's radius to 0 I got the correct bounds, -1<Re(a)<Re(b)-1. The branch I'm working with has [tex]0<\arg z<2\pi[/tex]...so I got my total contour integral as

[tex]\oint_{C}\frac{z^a}{z^b+1}dz=\int_0^{\infty}\frac{z^a}{z^b+1}dz-\int_0^{\infty}\frac{(e^{2\pi i}z)^a}{(e^{2\pi i}z)^b+1}dz=[1-e^{2\pi ia}(e^{2\pi ib})^{-(a+1)/b}]\int_0^{\infty}\frac{z^a}{z^b+1}dz.[/tex] I substituted there to get rid of that exponential in the denominator.

Then I figured that [tex]z^b+1[/tex] has order 1 poles (because it can be factored) at [tex]e^{i\pi(2k-1)/b},\;\;k=0,1,2...b-1.[/tex] I calculated the residues at these points as [tex]\frac{1}{b}e^{i\pi a(2k-1)/b}(e^{i\pi(2k-1)/b})^{1-b}.[/tex]

Then I summed the residues from k=0->b-1, multiplied by 2 pi i, equated with the contour integral before, but when I do the algebra it doesn't reduce to a cosecant, though it comes really close. I think I messed up with my branch cut contributions on the contour integral. Any ideas? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2

Your approach to this problem seems correct, but it is difficult to pinpoint where the error may have occurred without seeing your full calculation. However, I would suggest double checking your calculations for the residues and for the contour integral. It is possible that a small mistake was made in one of these steps which is causing the discrepancy.

Additionally, I would recommend considering alternative methods for solving this integral, such as using the Residue Theorem or evaluating it as a Laplace transform. Sometimes approaching a problem from a different angle can help in finding the solution.

I hope this helps and good luck with your proof!
 

FAQ: Integral (using complex analysis)

What is the definition of an integral using complex analysis?

An integral using complex analysis is a mathematical concept used to calculate the area under a complex-valued function. It involves breaking the function into smaller, simpler parts and using complex numbers and complex variables in the integration process.

How is complex analysis used in calculating integrals?

Complex analysis is used in calculating integrals by treating the complex-valued function as a two-dimensional surface and using techniques such as contour integration and Cauchy's integral formula to evaluate the integral.

What is the relationship between real and complex integrals?

The relationship between real and complex integrals is that the real integral is a special case of the complex integral, where the function being integrated is purely real. Complex integrals allow for a more general approach to integration, as they can handle functions with both real and imaginary components.

What are some applications of integrals using complex analysis?

Integrals using complex analysis have various applications in mathematics, physics, and engineering. They can be used to solve differential equations, analyze the behavior of electrical circuits, and calculate the areas of complex shapes, among other things.

Are there any drawbacks to using complex analysis in integration?

One potential drawback of using complex analysis in integration is that it involves more advanced mathematical concepts and techniques, which may be challenging for some to understand. Additionally, complex integrals can be more computationally intensive compared to real integrals.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
752
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
890
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top