Integral with delta and unit step functions in the integrand

  • Thread starter Hill
  • Start date
In summary, the integral involving delta and unit step functions is a mathematical technique used to evaluate integrals where these functions serve as generalized functions or distributions. The delta function, denoted as δ(x), captures the value of a function at a specific point, while the unit step function, denoted as u(x), defines the behavior of a function based on its domain. When incorporated into an integrand, the delta function effectively "picks out" the value of the function at the delta's argument, while the unit step function controls the limits of integration, allowing for piecewise analysis of functions across different intervals. This combination is valuable in applications such as signal processing, control systems, and theoretical physics.
  • #1
Hill
719
569
Homework Statement
Show that $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)=\frac 1 {2 \omega_k}$$ where ##\theta(x)## is the unit step function and ##\omega_k \equiv \sqrt {\vec k^2 +m^2}##.
Relevant Equations
##k^2={k^0}^2 - \vec k ^2##
##\omega _k ^2 = \vec k^2 +m^2##
##k^2 - m^2 = {k^0}^2 - \omega_k^2##
##dk^0= \frac {d{k^0}^2} {2k^0}##
##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac {d{k^0}^2} {2k^0} \delta ({k^0}^2 - \omega_k^2) \theta (k^0) = \frac 1 {2 \omega_k} \theta (\omega_k) = \frac 1 {2 \omega_k}##

Wouldn't the result be the same without the unit step function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hill said:
Homework Statement: Show that $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)=\frac 1 {2 \omega_k}$$ where ##\theta(x)## is the unit step function and ##\omega_k \equiv \sqrt {\vec k^2 +m^2}##.
Relevant Equations: ##k^2={k^0}^2 - \vec k ^2##

##\omega _k ^2 = \vec k^2 +m^2##
##k^2 - m^2 = {k^0}^2 - \omega_k^2##
##dk^0= \frac {d{k^0}^2} {2k^0}##
##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac {d{k^0}^2} {2k^0} \delta ({k^0}^2 - \omega_k^2) \theta (k^0) = \frac 1 {2 \omega_k} \theta (\omega_k) = \frac 1 {2 \omega_k}##

Wouldn't the result be the same without the unit step function?
With the theta function, $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)=\int_{0}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) $$

Without the theta function, we have $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2)$$ The integrand is an even function of ##k^0##, so $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) = 2\int_{0}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2)$$ This is twice the result for the case with the theta function.

I good approach to evaluating the integral is to use property #7 of the delta function listed here.
Property #6 in the list is a special case of #7 and is directly relevant to your integral.
 
  • Informative
Likes Hill
  • #3
TSny said:
With the theta function, $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)=\int_{0}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) $$

Without the theta function, we have $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2)$$ The integrand is an even function of ##k^0##, so $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) = 2\int_{0}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2)$$ This is twice the result for the case with the theta function.

I good approach to evaluating the integral is to use property #7 of the delta function listed here.
Property #6 in the list is a special case of #7 and is directly relevant to your integral.
Thank you very much. I see my mistake now: when replacing ##k^0## with ##\omega_k## I've missed that it can be ##+\omega_k## and ##-\omega_k##. The unit step function eliminates one of them.
 
  • #4
The last part of that exercise is to show that $$\int \frac {d^3k} {2 \omega_k}$$ is Lorentz invariant.
Using the equation above, I get $$\int \frac {d^3k} {2 \omega_k}=\int {d^3k} \int dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)= \int d^4k \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)$$
Now, ##d^4k## and ##k^2-m^2## are Lorentz invariant, but ##k^0## isn't. What do I miss?
 
  • #5
Hill said:
The last part of that exercise is to show that $$\int \frac {d^3k} {2 \omega_k}$$ is Lorentz invariant.
Using the equation above, I get $$\int \frac {d^3k} {2 \omega_k}=\int {d^3k} \int dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)= \int d^4k \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)$$
Now, ##d^4k## and ##k^2-m^2## are Lorentz invariant, but ##k^0## isn't. What do I miss?
The step-function ##\theta (k^0)## depends only on the sign of ##k^0## and so is invariant under any Lorentz transform that doesn't include time-reversal.
 
  • Like
Likes Hill

FAQ: Integral with delta and unit step functions in the integrand

What is the Dirac delta function, and how does it behave under integration?

The Dirac delta function, denoted as δ(x), is a generalized function or distribution that is zero everywhere except at x = 0, where it is infinitely high such that its integral over the entire real line is equal to 1. Mathematically, it is defined by the property: ∫_{-∞}^{∞} δ(x) f(x) dx = f(0) for any continuous function f(x). This means that the delta function "picks out" the value of the function at the point where the delta function is centered.

How does the unit step function, or Heaviside function, affect integration?

The unit step function, denoted as u(x) or H(x), is defined as 0 for x < 0 and 1 for x ≥ 0. When integrating a function that includes the unit step function, the effect is to change the limits of integration. For example, integrating f(x)u(x) from -∞ to ∞ is equivalent to integrating f(x) from 0 to ∞ because u(x) is zero for all x < 0.

How do you integrate a function that includes both the Dirac delta function and the unit step function?

When integrating a function that includes both the Dirac delta function and the unit step function, you need to consider the properties of both. For example, ∫_{-∞}^{∞} f(x) δ(x-a) u(x-b) dx will depend on the relative positions of a and b. If a < b, the integral will be zero because u(x-b) is zero at x = a. If a ≥ b, the integral will be f(a) because the delta function will pick out the value of f at x = a, and the unit step function will be 1 at that point.

Can the Dirac delta function be differentiated, and how does this affect integration?

The Dirac delta function can be differentiated in the sense of distributions. The derivative of the delta function, δ'(x), is defined such that ∫_{-∞}^{∞} δ'(x) f(x) dx = -f'(0) for any smooth function f(x). This property can be used in integration by parts, where the delta function's derivative effectively shifts the differentiation onto the other function in the integrand.

What are some common applications of integrals involving delta and unit step functions?

Integrals involving delta and unit step functions are common in various fields of physics and engineering. They are used in signal processing to model impulse responses, in control theory to describe system responses to sudden inputs, and

Back
Top