Integrals: Method of Exhaustion

In summary, the conversation discusses finding the area of a function using the method of exhaustion. The speaker mentions a mistake in their calculation and asks for help in finding the correct solution. The expert in summarizing content points out the mistake and suggests providing more clear and specific information in future questions.
  • #1
courtrigrad
1,236
2
Find the area of [tex] y = 2x^{2} [/tex] using the method of exhaustion. I know the area to be [tex] \frac{2x^{3}}{3} [/tex] from the rules. However, in Apostol's book, it shows you that the area under of [tex] y = x^{2} [/tex] is [tex] \frac{x^{3}}{3} [/tex]. So I will consider that a given. That means, intuitively, the area of [tex] y = 2x^{2} [/tex] is [tex] \frac{2x^{3}}{3} [/tex].

I drew the graph, and found that the area of the rectangle was: [tex] (\frac{b}{n})(\frac{2k^{2}b^{2}}{n^{2}}) [/tex] = [tex] \frac{b^{3}}{n^{3}} 2k^{2} [/tex]. So, [tex] S_{n} = \frac{2b^{3}}{n^{3}}(1^{2}+2^{2} + .. + n^{2}) [/tex] and [tex] s_{n} \frac{2b^{3}}{n^{3}}(1^{2}+ 2^{2} + ... + (n-1)^{2}) [/tex]

We know that [tex] 1^{2} + 2^{2} + ... + n^{2} = \frac{n^{3}}{3} + \frac{n^{2}}{2} + \frac{n}{6} [/tex].

So [tex] 1^{2} + 2^{2} + ... + (n-1)^{2}} < \frac{2n^{3}}{3}< 1^{2}+2^{2}+...+n^{2} [/tex]. Multiplying both sides by [tex] \frac{2b^{3}}{n^{3}} [/tex] we get [tex] s_{n} < \frac{4b^{3}}{3} < S_{n} [/tex]. But I know the area to be [tex] \frac{2b^{3}}{3} [/tex]. Where did I make my mistake?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The following is wrong:

[tex] 1^{2} + 2^{2} + ... + n^{2} = \frac{n^{3}}{3} + \frac{n^{2}}{2} + \frac{n}{6}[/tex]

It should be:

[tex] 1^{2} + 2^{2} + ... + n^{2} = \frac{n^{3}}{3} + \frac{n^{2}}{2} + \frac{n}{6} + \frac{1}{6}[/tex]

but that won't make a big difference. The real problem is in:

[tex] 1^{2} + 2^{2} + ... + (n-1)^{2}} < \frac{2n^{3}}{3}< 1^{2}+2^{2}+...+n^{2} [/tex]

it should be:

[tex] 1^{2} + 2^{2} + ... + (n-1)^{2}} < \frac{n^{3}}{3}< 1^{2}+2^{2}+...+n^{2} [/tex]

I have to say that it's very frustrating to help someone like you:
I drew the graph, and found that the area of the rectangle was: [itex](\frac{b}{n})(\frac{2k^{2}b^{2}}{n^{2}})[/itex]
You don't even bother to say which rectangle. We can't read your mind. And what are b, k, and n? Also, it doesn't make sense to say, "the area of y = x2". After taking far more effort than I should have to take in order to help you I actually managed to figure out what all this stuff you meant was. Next time, if you want help, make the effort to be clear; that way, it isn't difficult for others to help you just because they can't understand you. I mean, it's not as though you just have a problem with English and don't know you to express yourself. You just started using letters and variables with no explanation of what they denoted. You may as well have defined these letters in your native language, it would have been better than not defining them at all, as you did.
 
  • #3
Isn't it obvious that
[tex] 1^{2} + 2^{2} + ... + (n-1)^{2}} < \frac{2n^{3}}{3}< 1^{2}+2^{2}+...+n^{2} [/tex]
is wrong?

If n= 2 then the two sums are 12= 1 and 12+ 22= 5 but [itex]\frac{2(2^3)}{3}= \frac{16}{3}=5\frac{1}{3}[/itex] which is not between 1 and 5!

Did you lose the "6" denominator somewhere?
 
  • #4
Sorry for the ambiguity. It's just that this is my first time really studying the subject. But I learned that [tex] 1^{2} + 2^{2} + ... + (n-1)^{2}} < \frac{n^{3}}{3}< 1^{2}+2^{2}+...+n^{2} [/tex] should be assumed.
 
  • #5
Also for [tex] y = ax^{2} + c [/tex] what would the upper and lower sums be? I know that the area bounded by the curve and the x-axis is [tex] \frac{ax^{3}}{3} + cx [/tex]. Let's say that the length of the interval is b . We divide the interval into equal subintervals of length [tex] \frac{b}{n} [/tex]. The area of a rectangle k is [tex] (\frac{b}{n})(a(\frac{kb}{n})^{2}+c) [/tex]. So the lower sum [tex] s_{n} = 1^{2} + 2^{2} + ... + (n-1)^{2}( \frac{ab^{3}}{n^{3}}) + \frac{b^{3}}{n^{3}}(1+2+... + n) [/tex]. So do I just use the fact that [tex] 1+2 +... + n = \frac{1}{2}n(n-1) [/tex]?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Again, you're not clear. There are infinitely many intervals of length b. Since I already figured out what you had done in your first post, I know what you mean now, but you aren't communicating in such a way that makes it easy for people to help you. Draw a picture and upload it. Clearly define what you're talking about, and show your work. I can tell you that your sn is wrong, and I can even tell you what the answer should be, but I won't help you as it will encourage you to continue to ask questions the way you have.
 
  • #7
I already got it.

Thanks ...
 

FAQ: Integrals: Method of Exhaustion

What is the Method of Exhaustion for integrals?

The Method of Exhaustion is a technique developed by ancient Greek mathematicians to approximate the area under a curve by using a series of increasingly smaller polygons or shapes that closely approximate the shape of the curve. By using an infinite number of these polygons, the area under the curve can be accurately calculated.

How does the Method of Exhaustion differ from other methods of integration?

The Method of Exhaustion differs from other methods of integration, such as the Riemann sum or the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, in that it does not rely on limit calculations. Instead, it uses a geometric approach to approximate the area under a curve.

What are the key steps in using the Method of Exhaustion?

The key steps in using the Method of Exhaustion are: 1) dividing the curve into smaller shapes, such as rectangles or triangles, 2) calculating the area of each of these shapes, 3) adding up the areas of all the shapes, and 4) taking the limit as the shapes become infinitely small. This will give an accurate approximation of the area under the curve.

What types of curves can the Method of Exhaustion be used for?

The Method of Exhaustion can be used for any continuous curve, as long as it can be divided into smaller shapes that can be accurately calculated. This includes polynomial, exponential, trigonometric, and logarithmic functions, among others.

Can the Method of Exhaustion be used for any type of integration problem?

The Method of Exhaustion is best suited for finding the area under a curve, but it can also be used for other types of integration problems, such as finding the volume of a solid or the length of a curve. However, it may not always be the most efficient method for these types of problems, and other integration techniques may be more appropriate.

Back
Top