Integrating a Kronecker Delta with F(u) and G(v)

In summary: So the integral is 0.In summary, the integral given is most likely zero due to the Kronecker delta and the fact that the integral is over a one-dimensional set with two-dimensional measure 0.
  • #1
natski
267
2
Hi alll,

I have an integral which includes a Kronecker delta:

[tex]
I = \int_{u=0}^{a} \int_{v=0}^{a} F(u) G(v) \delta_{u,v} \, \mathrm{d}u \, \mathrm{d}v
[/tex]

I know that for a 1D integral there exists the special property: \int F(u) DiracDelta(u-a) = F(a)

However, is there something equivalent for the problem I have stated in the first equation? I was thinking perhaps that:

I = \int F(u) G(u) du dv or something similar...

Cheers,

Natski
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Fixing your latex to make it readable:

[tex]
I = \int_{u=0}^{a} \int_{v=0}^{a} F(u) G(v) \delta_{u,v} du dv
[/tex]
 
  • #3
Are you sure that it is a Kronecker Delta and not a Dirac Delta?
 
  • #4
Yes I believe so, but I did derive the equation myself. I thought there would be a way to convert between the two types of delta functions...
 
  • #5
I have just obtained the following simplification, which may make the next step easier:

[tex]
I = \int_{u=0}^{a} \int_{v=0}^{a} F(u) F(v) \delta_{u,v} \, \mathrm{d}u \, \mathrm{d}v
[/tex]

i.e. the two functions are the same, just with a different variable.

Natski
 
  • #6
I think it should be zero... the only thing that makes the integral with a Dirac Delta produce something different of zero is that it assumes infinite value at a certain point. For any finite value, which is the case for any function by definition (the Dirac Delta is NOT a function by definition), the Riemann integral should be zero, as it's not altered by a single point.
 
  • #7
You're really sure it's a Kronecker delta? Were you always dealing with integrals, or did you have sums that you approximated as integrals?

How did you arrive at this equation? Kronecker deltas do not take continuous variables as their arguments, so I would suspect that you either converted sums to integrals but didn't convert the Kronecker delta or you made some other error. Please tell us how you got the Kronecker so that we can try to figure out what the problem is.
 
  • #8
Yes it is definitely Kronecker.

I also think that this integral is zero. When I plot the function, it looks like a 2D function in a 3D environment and thus the "area" under the curve is infinitesimal.

Thanks for your advise on this!

Natski
 
  • #9
natski said:
Hi alll,

I have an integral which includes a Kronecker delta:

[tex]
I = \int_{u=0}^{a} \int_{v=0}^{a} F(u) G(v) \delta_{u,v} \, \mathrm{d}u \, \mathrm{d}v
[/tex]

I know that for a 1D integral there exists the special property: \int F(u) DiracDelta(u-a) = F(a)

However, is there something equivalent for the problem I have stated in the first equation? I was thinking perhaps that:

I = \int F(u) G(u) du dv or something similar...

Cheers,

Natski
If this is, in fact, a continuous Kronecker [itex]\delta[/itex], [itex]\delta_{xy}= 1[/itex] if x= y, 0 other wise, then [itex]F(u)G(u)\delta_{uv}[/itex] is 0 except on the line u= v. Since that is one dimensional it has two dimensional measure 0 and the double integral of any function on that set is 0.
 

FAQ: Integrating a Kronecker Delta with F(u) and G(v)

What is a Kronecker Delta and how is it used?

The Kronecker Delta is a mathematical symbol denoted by δ that is used to represent the identity matrix in linear algebra. It is a function of two variables, u and v, and has a value of 1 when u and v are equal, and 0 when they are not equal.

How do you integrate a Kronecker Delta with F(u) and G(v)?

To integrate a Kronecker Delta with two functions, F(u) and G(v), you can use the property of the delta function that it is equal to 1 when its arguments are equal and 0 otherwise. This means that when integrating with respect to u, you can replace u with v in the function F(u), and when integrating with respect to v, you can replace v with u in the function G(v). This simplifies the integration process and allows you to solve the integral using basic integration techniques.

What is the significance of integrating a Kronecker Delta with F(u) and G(v) in scientific research?

Integrating a Kronecker Delta with two functions, F(u) and G(v), is commonly used in scientific research, particularly in fields such as signal processing and quantum mechanics. It allows for the simplification of complex integrals and can help to solve equations involving multiple variables.

Are there any limitations to integrating a Kronecker Delta with F(u) and G(v)?

One limitation of integrating a Kronecker Delta with two functions is that it can only be used when the variables u and v are independent of each other. If there is a relationship between u and v, such as u = v^2, then the integration cannot be simplified using the Kronecker Delta.

Can the Kronecker Delta be integrated with more than two functions?

Yes, the Kronecker Delta can be integrated with more than two functions. The same principle applies, where the variables in the functions can be replaced with each other to simplify the integration process. However, the number of variables must be equal to the number of functions for this method to be applicable.

Similar threads

Back
Top