Integrating Volume via Shells: What Went Wrong with the Bounds?

In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of the volume of the region bounded by 1/x^4, y = 0, x = 2, and x = 6 about the axis y = -4 using shells. The correct approach is to use disks instead of shells and to account for the fact that the right hand curve is not a single piece.
  • #1
PhizKid
477
1

Homework Statement


Volume of the region bounded by 1/x^4, y = 0, x = 2, and x = 6 about the axis y = -4


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



XFHCwOW.png


The height for any shell is x(y) - 2, or [itex]\sqrt[4]{\frac{1}{y}} - 2[/itex]

The radius of any shell is y + 4

So the circumference is 2*pi*(y + 4), and the surface area is then [2*pi*(y + 4)] * [itex][\sqrt[4]{\frac{1}{y}} - 2][/itex]

So I integrate this from 0 to 1/(2^4) because y(2) = 1/(2^4) which is the upper boundary on the y-axis and the lower boundary is 0.

Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
PhizKid said:

Homework Statement


Volume of the region bounded by 1/x^4, y = 0, x = 2, and x = 6 about the axis y = -4


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



XFHCwOW.png


The height for any shell is x(y) - 2, or [itex]\sqrt[4]{\frac{1}{y}} - 2[/itex]

The radius of any shell is y + 4

So the circumference is 2*pi*(y + 4), and the surface area is then [2*pi*(y + 4)] * [itex][\sqrt[4]{\frac{1}{y}} - 2][/itex]

So I integrate this from 0 to 1/(2^4) because y(2) = 1/(2^4) which is the upper boundary on the y-axis and the lower boundary is 0.

Where did I go wrong?

The first place you went wrong was choosing to use shells in the first place. The problem is more naturally done with disks. Anyway, given that you are using shells, remember that the height of the shell in this example is ##x_{right} - x_{left}##. The problem is that the right hand curve is not a single piece. Part of it is the line ##x=6##. You have to break the integral into two parts to account for that.
 

FAQ: Integrating Volume via Shells: What Went Wrong with the Bounds?

What is "Integrating volume via shells"?

"Integrating volume via shells" is a method of finding the volume of a solid object by breaking it down into infinitesimally thin cylindrical shells and integrating their volumes.

2. When is it appropriate to use this method?

This method is appropriate for objects that have a cylindrical or rotational symmetry, such as a cone, cylinder, or torus.

3. How does this method differ from other methods of finding volume?

Unlike other methods such as integration by cross-section or the disk method, integrating volume via shells does not require the object to have a flat base or cross-section. This method is more versatile and can be applied to a wider range of objects.

4. What are the steps involved in integrating volume via shells?

The steps involved are:1. Identify the axis of rotation.2. Create an infinitesimally thin cylindrical shell along the axis of rotation.3. Find the volume of the shell using the formula V = 2πrhΔx, where r is the radius, h is the height, and Δx is the thickness of the shell.4. Integrate the volumes of all the shells from the initial value to the final value of x.5. Simplify the resulting integral and solve for the volume.

5. What are the advantages of using this method?

Integrating volume via shells allows for a more accurate and precise calculation of volume for objects with curved or irregular shapes. It also allows for a more efficient calculation as it does not require the use of multiple integrals or complicated formulas.

Back
Top