How Does Integration by Factors Relate to the Product Rule and FTC?

In summary, integration by factors, also known as integration by parts, is a technique that derives from the product rule of differentiation. The product rule states that the derivative of the product of two functions is the derivative of the first function multiplied by the second function plus the first function multiplied by the derivative of the second. Integration by parts essentially reverses this process, allowing one to integrate a product of functions by identifying one function to differentiate and another to integrate. This method is closely related to the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC), which connects differentiation and integration, emphasizing how the operations are inverse processes. Thus, understanding these relationships enhances the effectiveness of solving integrals and applying calculus principles.
  • #1
Delta2
Insights Author
Gold Member
6,002
2,628
Homework Statement
if ##f(x)## has period ##2\pi## and it is positive and differentiable, prove that $$\int_0^{2\pi} (f(x)\cos x)(f(x)\sin x)'dx=\frac{1}{2}\int_0^{2\pi}f^2(x)dx$$
Relevant Equations
integration by factors ##\int f(x)g'(x)=[f(x)g(x)]-\int f'(x) g(x)##.
I tried to prove this but I fall into a loop when I try to apply integration by factors, that is I prove that the integral is equal to itself.

Any helpfull tips?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Im on my phone, so I cannot see anything past the f2. Sine and cosine derivatives are related. You'll likely need that. Maybe use product rule to expand (f * sin)' first
 
  • #3
Is it true? Try ##f(x) = \cos x##.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave and Delta2
  • #4
PeroK said:
Is it true? Try ##f(x) = \cos x##.
I forgot to say that ##f(x)## is positive in ##[0,2\pi]##. And of course ##f## is differentiable.
 
  • #5
@PeroK let me ask you the dual problem , it holds that $$\int_0^{2\pi} (f(x)\cos x)(f(x)\cos x)'=0$$ right?

But yeah i am not 100% sure if the original problem is true or not .
 
  • #6
Delta2 said:
I forgot to say that ##f(x)## is positive in ##[0,2\pi]##. And of course ##f## is differentiable.
Try ##f(x) = \cos^2 x##.
 
  • #7
PeroK said:
Try ##f(x) = \cos^2 x##.
Don't see any light in the tunnel, I tried expanding the derivative but it goes a mess, hold on while I try better.

About the other integral you agree it is zero?
 
  • #8
Delta2 said:
Don't see any light in the tunnel, I tried expanding the derivative but it goes a mess, hold on while I try better.

About the other integral you agree it is zero?
I think you can't prove it because it isn't true!
 
  • Skeptical
Likes Delta2
  • #9
PeroK said:
I think you can't prove it because it isn't true!
Ok, the other integral is not equal to zero either?
 
  • #10
Where it goes wrong for the other I set $$g(x)=f(x)\cos x$$ so it goes $$\int_0^{2\pi}g(x)g'(x)dx=\frac{1}{2}[g^2(2\pi)-g^2(0)]=0$$ since ##g(2\pi)=g(0)## from the periodicity of f(x) and cosx.
 
  • #11
Forgot a factor of ##\frac{1}{2}## in the initial problem, I ll try to edit it.
 
  • #12
Delta2 said:
Ok, the other integral is not equal to zero either?
Plug in ##f(x) = \cos^2 x## and see whether the equality holds.
 
  • #13
PeroK said:
Plug in ##f(x) = \cos^2 x## and see whether the equality holds.
yes I tried this and by expanding the derivative and with the help of wolfram it gives zero indeed.
 
  • #14
I tried the other too (initial problem) and wolfram says that it is true! (for ##f(x)=cos^2(x)## (with the 1/2 factor correction). Beware I am not asking for the indefinite integrals but for the definite integrals within the period interval ##[0,2\pi]## .
 
  • #15
Tried ##f(x)=\sin^2 x## and it works again wolfram says the integrals are equal to ##3\frac{\pi}{8}##.
 
  • #16
Delta2 said:
Tried ##f(x)=\sin^2 x## and it works again wolfram says the integrals are equal to ##3\frac{\pi}{8}##.
Including an additional factor of ##1/2##!
 
  • Haha
Likes Delta2
  • #17
Er yes the integral on the left is ##\frac{3\pi}{8}## and on the right ##\frac{3\pi}{4}##.
 
  • #18
So it seems to be true after all, but I fall into an infinite loop if I try to use integration by factors to prove it.
 
  • #19
Tried ##f(x)=\cos x## and again it is true, (integrals are now equal to ##\pi## and ##\pi/2##.) so not sure if the requirement for f being positive is of any use.
 
  • #20
Proved it by considering ##f## as Fourier series $$f(x)=\sum a_n \sin(nx)+b_n\cos(nx)$$.

Since we are taking the definite integrals over the period interval, many integrals in the resulting sums become zero and only some crucial integrals survive that equal to multiples of pi. The equality to prove goes down to $$\sum (a_n^2+b_n^2)\frac{\pi}{2}$$ in both sides.

Not so easy not so hard either, maybe there is a clever shortcut with integration by factors? Come to think of it I should 've named this thread Fourier series, unless someone can find a clever shortcut using integration by factors.
 
Last edited:
  • #21
Delta2 said:
Homework Statement: if ##f(x)## has period ##2\pi## and it is positive and differentiable, prove that $$\int_0^{2\pi} (f(x)\cos x)(f(x)\sin x)'dx=\frac{1}{2}\int_0^{2\pi}f^2(x)dx$$
There's no need for ##f(x)## to be positive:
$$\int_0^{2\pi} (f(x)\cos x)(f(x)\sin x)' \ dx = \int_0^{2\pi} (f(x)\cos x)(f'(x)\sin x + f(x)\cos x) \ dx$$$$= \int_0^{2\pi} f^2(x)\cos^2 x + f(x)f'(x)\cos x\sin x \ dx$$$$= \int_0^{2\pi} f^2(x)\cos^2 x + \frac 1 2 \int_0^{2\pi} (f^2(x))'\cos x\sin x \ dx$$$$= \int_0^{2\pi} f^2(x)\cos^2 x - \frac 1 2 \int_0^{2\pi} (f^2(x))(\cos x\sin x)' \ dx \ \ (\text{by parts})$$$$= \dots$$
 
  • Love
Likes Delta2
  • #22
Well done @PeroK you found the clever shortcut, there was a solution with integration by parts as my meta-intuition suggested but for some reason I couldn't find it, I thought expanding the derivative is the first step towards hell e hehe.

But kind of fool you too for another reason, you initially thought it was wrong.
 
  • #23
Delta2 said:
Homework Statement: if ##f(x)## has period ##2\pi## and it is positive and differentiable, prove that $$\int_0^{2\pi} (f(x)\cos x)(f(x)\sin x)'dx=\frac{1}{2}\int_0^{2\pi}f^2(x)dx$$
Also, there's no requirement for ##f## to be be periodic.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #24
PeroK said:
Also, there's no requirement for ##f## to be be periodic.
There is : you cant set to zero that "thing" (the first term from integration by parts) if f is not periodic but ye just $$f(0)=f(2\pi)$$ is enough if that's what you mean.
 
  • #25
Oops yeah you right there is ##\sin(0)=\sin(2\pi)=0## there :D.
 
  • #26
I think a huge part of this is to use double angle identities and power reduction formulas. Let me know if I did anything wrong.

##\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \left[ f\left(x\right) \cos x \right] \left[ f\left(x\right) \sin x \right]' \, dx##

##= \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \left[ f\left(x\right) \cos x \right] \left[ f'\left(x\right) \sin x + f\left(x\right) \cos x\right] \, dx##

## = \int_{0}^{2 \pi} f\left(x \right) f' \left(x \right) \cos x \sin x + f^2 \left(x\right) \cos^2 x \,dx##

I'm going to use a double identity ##\sin 2x = 2 \sin x \cos x## and power reduction formula ##\cos^2 x = \frac{1 + \cos 2x}{2}##

## = \int_{0}^{2 \pi} f\left(x \right) f' \left(x \right) \frac{\sin 2x}{2} + f^2 \left(x\right) \frac{1 + \cos 2x}{2} \,dx##

## = \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \left(f'\left(x\right) f\left(x\right) \sin 2x + f^2 \left(x\right) \cos 2x\right) \,dx + \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} f^2\left(x\right)\,dx##

Recognize the first integrand (rather the first two) as a derivative of ##\frac{1}{4} f^2 \left( x \right) \sin 2x## by the product rule

##= \frac{1}{4} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \frac{d}{dx} \left(f^2 \sin 2x \right)\,dx + \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} f^2 \left(x \right) \, dx##

Use the fundamental theorem of calculus on the first integral

## = \frac{1}{4} \left. f^2 \left(x\right) \sin 2x \right|_{0}^{2 \pi} + \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} f^2 \left(x \right) \, dx##

## = 0 + \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} f^2 \left(x \right) \, dx##

##= \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} f^2 \left(x \right) \, dx##
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and Delta2
  • #27
@PhDeezNutz looks correct to me well done and you didn't use Integration by Factors, just well known trig identities and the FTC. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
  • #28
Delta2 said:
@PhDeezNutz looks correct to me well done and you didn't use Integration by Factors, just well known trig identities and the FTC. Thanks!

Did the problem statement explicitly ask to use integration by factors? If so I might have another go at it later today.
 
  • #29
PhDeezNutz said:
Did the problem statement explicitly ask to use integration by factors? If so I might have another go at it later today.
Nope, I just thought that was the most straightforward way to do it.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
  • #30
PhDeezNutz said:
Did the problem statement explicitly ask to use integration by factors? If so I might have another go at it later today.
Note that your method is an alternative way to do integration by parts. One of my grumbles about maths teaching is that integration by parts is presented as some exotic formula. Whereas, I would call it the inverse product rule, which is more self explanatory. From the product rule we have:
$$(f(x)g(x))' = f'(x)g(x) + f(x)g'(x)$$Integrating that equation gives:
$$\int(f(x)g(x))'\ dx= \int f'(x)g(x) \ dx + \int f(x)g'(x) \ dx$$And, applying the FTC gives:
$$f(x)g(x) = \int f'(x)g(x) \ dx + \int f(x)g'(x) \ dx$$And, finally, the parts formula:
$$\int f'(x)g(x) \ dx = f(x)g(x) - \int f(x)g'(x) \ dx$$Note that as long as you remember the product rule, you can forget integration by parts entirely.

PS note that because we have an indefinite integral on both sides of the equation, we do not need an explicit constant of integration.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
  • #31
PeroK said:
Note that as long as you remember the product rule, you can forget integration by parts entirely.
Exactly! IBF is actually product rule +FTC.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz

FAQ: How Does Integration by Factors Relate to the Product Rule and FTC?

What is Integration by Parts and how does it relate to the Product Rule?

Integration by Parts is a technique used to integrate the product of two functions. It is derived from the Product Rule of differentiation, which states that the derivative of the product of two functions is given by \( (uv)' = u'v + uv' \). Integration by Parts formula is \( \int u \, dv = uv - \int v \, du \), where \( u \) and \( dv \) are parts of the original integrand. This formula essentially reverses the Product Rule to facilitate integration.

How is the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) connected to Integration by Parts?

The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) connects differentiation and integration, stating that if \( F \) is an antiderivative of \( f \), then \( \int_a^b f(x) \, dx = F(b) - F(a) \). Integration by Parts can be seen as an application of the FTC, where we use the antiderivatives of parts of the product function to evaluate the integral. Specifically, the boundary terms \( uv \big|_a^b \) in the Integration by Parts formula are evaluated using the FTC.

Can Integration by Parts be applied multiple times, and how does this relate to the Product Rule?

Yes, Integration by Parts can be applied multiple times. This is particularly useful for integrals involving products of functions where repeated application simplifies the integral step-by-step. Each application of Integration by Parts is essentially using the Product Rule in reverse, breaking down the original product into simpler components until the integral becomes manageable.

What are common choices for \( u \) and \( dv \) in Integration by Parts, and how does this choice relate to the Product Rule?

Common choices for \( u \) and \( dv \) in Integration by Parts are guided by the LIATE rule (Logarithmic, Inverse trigonometric, Algebraic, Trigonometric, Exponential), which helps in selecting \( u \) to simplify the integral. This choice is related to the Product Rule because we aim to choose \( u \) and \( dv \) such that their derivatives and integrals, respectively, simplify the integration process, effectively reversing the differentiation of the product.

How does Integration by Parts help in solving integrals that are otherwise difficult to evaluate directly?

Integration by Parts transforms a difficult integral into a potentially simpler one by leveraging the relationship established by the Product Rule. By breaking down the product of functions into parts that are easier to integrate or differentiate, Integration by Parts can simplify the problem step-by-step. This method is particularly useful for integrals involving polynomial and

Back
Top