Integration by parts of inverse sine, a solved exercise, some doubts...

In summary, the document discusses the integration by parts technique applied to the inverse sine function. It includes a solved exercise demonstrating the method, along with some common doubts and clarifications related to the process. The focus is on effectively applying integration by parts to find the integral of the inverse sine, addressing potential challenges learners may face.
  • #1
mcastillo356
Gold Member
593
321
TL;DR Summary
There are steps I would like to understand, or, better said, share, check out.
Hi, PF, here goes an easy integral, meant to be an example of integration by parts.

Use integration by parts to evaluate
##\int \sin^{-1}x \, dx##

Let ##U=\sin^{-1}x,\quad{dV=dx}##
Then ##dU=dx/\sqrt{1-x^2},\quad{V=x}##

##=x\sin^{-1}x-\int \frac{x}{\sqrt{1-x^2} \, dx}##

Let ##u=1-x^2##,
##du=-2xdx##

##=x\sin^{-1}x+\frac{1}{2}\int u^{-1/2} \, du##
##=x\sin^{-1}x+u^{1/2}+C##
##=x\sin^{-1}x+\sqrt{1-x^2}+C##
Last substitution steps are where I need some clue: specifically understanding how, passed the first step, i.e, integration by parts, second integral is solved.

Attempt:
Second integral, ##\int \frac{x}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\,dx##, is not integration by parts, but the substitution method. If so, I will outline it:

##\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\cdot x##, which suits the circumstances to evaluate by the substitution method they way it does.

Greetings!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
After letting ##u=1-x^2##, we have that ##\frac{du}{-2x}=dx##. Substituting this into the second integral, we get that it is equivalent to $$-\frac12\int u^{-1/2}du$$. Using power rule and replacing the definition of ##u##, we get the result.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes mcastillo356 and PeroK
  • #3
mathhabibi said:
After letting ##u=1-x^2##, we have that ##\frac{du}{-2x}=dx##. Substituting this into the second integral, we get that it is equivalent to ##-\frac12\int u^{-1/2}du##. Using power rule and replacing the definition of ##u##, we get the result.
Hi, @mathhabibi, you mean power rule for integration?.
By the way, how is it to display a bigger and elegant indefinite integal?
Thanks!
 
  • #4
mcastillo356 said:
Hi, @mathhabibi, you mean power rule for integration?.
Yes.
mcastillo356 said:
By the way, how is it to display a bigger and elegant indefinite integal?
He used standalone (i.e. $$) tex delimiters rather than inline (##).
 
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356
  • #5
Hi, PF
mathhabibi said:
After letting ##u=1-x^2##, we have that ##\frac{du}{-2x}=dx##. Substituting this into the second integral, we get that it is equivalent to $$-\frac12\int u^{-1/2}du$$.
$$-\int {\frac{x}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\,dx}\Leftrightarrow{\frac{1}{2}\int u^{-1/2}\,du}$$
mathhabibi said:
Using power rule and replacing the definition of ##u##, we get the result.
$$\frac{1}{2}\int u^{-1/2}\,du$$
Applying the Power Rule for integration
$$=\frac{1}{2}\int {u^{-1/2}\,du}=\frac{1}{2}\cdot{\frac{u^{1/2}}{1/2}}+C=u^{1/2}+C$$
Replacing,
$$u=1-x^2\Rightarrow{u^{1/2}=\sqrt{1-x^2}}$$

Greetings!
 

FAQ: Integration by parts of inverse sine, a solved exercise, some doubts...

What is the formula for integration by parts?

The formula for integration by parts is derived from the product rule of differentiation and is given by: ∫u dv = uv - ∫v du, where u and v are differentiable functions of x. This technique is particularly useful for integrating products of functions.

How do you apply integration by parts to inverse sine (arcsin)?

To integrate the inverse sine function, you typically set u = arcsin(x) and dv = dx. Then, you differentiate u to find du = (1/√(1-x²)) dx and integrate dv to find v = x. Substitute these into the integration by parts formula to solve the integral.

Can you provide a solved example of integrating arcsin(x)?

Sure! To integrate ∫arcsin(x) dx, let u = arcsin(x) and dv = dx. Then, du = (1/√(1-x²)) dx and v = x. Applying integration by parts, we have: ∫arcsin(x) dx = x*arcsin(x) - ∫x/(√(1-x²)) dx. The remaining integral can be solved using a substitution, leading to the final result.

What are common mistakes when using integration by parts with inverse sine?

Common mistakes include incorrectly choosing u and dv, leading to complicated integrals, forgetting to apply the limits of integration when dealing with definite integrals, and miscalculating the derivative or integral of the chosen functions. Careful selection and calculation are crucial for success.

Are there any alternative methods to integrate arcsin(x)?

Yes, besides integration by parts, you can use trigonometric substitution or numerical methods for definite integrals. For instance, using the substitution x = sin(θ) can simplify the integral, as arcsin(sin(θ)) = θ, which can lead to a more straightforward integration process.

Similar threads

Back
Top