- #1
fluidistic
Gold Member
- 3,950
- 264
Homework Statement
Consider the following waves: [tex]\vec E _1 (\vec r , t) =\vec E_1 (\vec r) e^{-i \omega t}[/tex] and [tex]\vec E _2 (\vec r , t) =\vec E_2 (\vec r) e^{-i \omega t}[/tex] where the form of the wavefront isn't specified and where [tex]\vec E_1[/tex] and [tex]\vec E_2[/tex] are complex vectors which depend on spatial coordinates and the angle of the initial phase. Show that the term of interferance is given by [tex]I_{12}=\frac{1}{2} (\vec E _1 \cdot \vec E _2 ^* +\vec E _2 \cdot \vec E _1 ^*)[/tex]
Homework Equations
Not sure.
The Attempt at a Solution
Is it just me or the given E fields do NOT depend on the angle of initial phase?!
I took their E fields function, summed them up. It gave me [tex]e^{-i \omega t} [ \vec E _1 (\vec r ) + \vec E _2 (\vec r )][/tex].
Now if I remember well, the intensity of the resultant wave is proportional to the E field squared.
So I squared the expression I just wrote and I reached [tex]I_{12} = \alpha e^{-2i \omega t} [\vec E _1 ^2 (\vec r ) +\vec E _2 ^2 (\vec r ) +2 \vec E _1 (\vec r) \vec E _2 (\vec r ) ][/tex]. Now I guess the interference term is [tex]\alpha \vec E _1 (\vec r) \vec E _2[/tex] but it does not match the answer.
I realize that the given interference term is worth the sum of the product of the real parts and complex parts of [tex]\vec E _1[/tex] and [tex]\vec E _2[/tex] and precisely, this is not what happens in my answer.
Where did I go wrong?