- #1
johndoe3344
- 29
- 0
I found this in my notes, and I memorized it, but I have no idea why this is. Could anyone shed some light:
Given:
A mutation in A gives repressed reporter expression, while a mutation in B gives constitutive reporter expression.
If:
A double mutation in A and B gives repressed reporter expression... then A positively regulates reporter expression and is negatively regulated by B.
If:
A double mutation in A and B gives constitutive reporter expression... then B negatively regulates reporter expression and is negatively regulated by A.
Why is this the case? Thanks.
Given:
A mutation in A gives repressed reporter expression, while a mutation in B gives constitutive reporter expression.
If:
A double mutation in A and B gives repressed reporter expression... then A positively regulates reporter expression and is negatively regulated by B.
If:
A double mutation in A and B gives constitutive reporter expression... then B negatively regulates reporter expression and is negatively regulated by A.
Why is this the case? Thanks.