- #1
fab13
- 318
- 6
- TL;DR Summary
- I would like to demonstrate the formula that defines the standard deviation of a 𝐶ℓ and mostly justify the presence of the factor Δℓ when we have a finite number of 𝐶ℓ's angular power spectrum and associated finite number of multipole ℓ (generated by a code ). I tried at the end of my post to calculate the mean Cℓ for a single bin but it is missing a factor 2. Any help would be really appreciated. This is a problem about the theorical/numerical frontier given the fact I have not Δℓ=1.
Hello,
In the context of Legendre expansion with ##C_\ell## quantities, below the following formula which is the error on a ##C_\ell## :
##\sigma_(C_{\ell})=\sqrt{\frac{2}{(2 \ell+1)\Delta\ell}}\,C_{\ell}\quad(1)##
where ##\Delta\ell## is the width of the multipoles bins used when computing the angular power spectra.
I would like to understand why this factor appears. Normally, we can infer the expression of ##\sigma_(C_{\ell})## and get :
##\sigma_(C_{\ell})=\sqrt{\frac{2}{(2 \ell+1)}}\,C_{\ell}##
That is to say, without having the ##\Delta\ell## factor under the root.
In my case, I have only a finite number of multipoles ##\ell## (60 exactly) in a range between 10 and 5000 and 60 corresponding ##C_\ell##. From my tutor, to compute this standard-deviation, I have to take :
##\Delta\ell=(4990/60)##.
But I would like to understand why I have to use this factor when we have a finite number of equidistant multipoles with associated ##C_\ell## values.
For example, my tutor told me that, ideally, we would have a ##C_\ell## for each ##\ell=1..N##, i.e with ##\ell=1,2,3,4,...N## with the formula :
##\sigma(C_{\ell})^2=\frac{2}{(2 \ell+1)}\,C_{\ell}^{2}##
But he mentionned that, like we have only a finite number of equidistant multipoles ##\ell##, we are obliged to use this factor ##\Delta\ell## in our case (equation##(1)##).
My tutor told me it is like an average on the expression with multipole ##\ell##, i.e on the factor ##\sqrt{\dfrac{2}{(2\ell+1)}}##, but I didn't fully understand this meaning.
Could anyone help me to justify the using of this factor ##\Delta\ell## ?
UPDATE : Someone tried quickly to explain why we introduce this factor ##\Delta\ell## inside the square root, but I am still confused about this demonstration.
Here is his reasoning :
For the interval ##b##: ##b=[\ell, \ell+\Delta\ell]##, one has :
##C_{\ell,b}=\dfrac{1}{\Delta\ell}\,\sum_{\ell'=\ell}^{\ell'+\Delta\ell}\,C_{\ell'}##
If one takes the variance, then :
##\text{Var}(C_{\ell,b})=\dfrac{1}{\Delta\ell^2}\,\sum_{\ell'}\text{Var}(C_{\ell'})##
##\text{Var}(C_{\ell,b})=\dfrac{1}{\Delta\ell^2}\,\sum_{\ell'}\dfrac{2}{(2\ell'+1)}\,(C_{\ell'})\quad(2)##
Important step here, one considers the equality (which is actually an approximation) :
##\sum_{\ell'}\dfrac{2}{(2\ell'+1)}\,(C_{\ell'})=\dfrac{2}{(2\ell_{mean}+1)}\,(C_{\ell'_{mean}}^2)\,\Delta\ell\quad(3)##
This way, we have from equation ##(2)## :
##\text{Var}(C_{\ell,b})\simeq \dfrac{1}{\Delta\ell^2}\,\dfrac{2}{(2\ell_{mean}+1)}\,(C_{\ell'_{mean}}^2)\,\Delta\ell##
Finally the expression of the variance for the interval ##b##:
##\text{Var}(C_{\ell,b})\simeq \dfrac{1}{\Delta\ell}\,\dfrac{2}{(2\ell_{mean}+1)}\,(C_{\ell'_{mean}}^2)##
I still didn't understand the step between ##(2)## and ##(3)##.
For me, an average is under the form :
##C_{\ell'_{mean}}=\dfrac{1}{2}\,(C_{\ell'}+C_{\ell'+\Delta\ell})## but I can't see this factor ##\dfrac{1}{2}## in this reasoning.
If someone could explain this critical step between ##(2)## and ##(3)##.
In the context of Legendre expansion with ##C_\ell## quantities, below the following formula which is the error on a ##C_\ell## :
##\sigma_(C_{\ell})=\sqrt{\frac{2}{(2 \ell+1)\Delta\ell}}\,C_{\ell}\quad(1)##
where ##\Delta\ell## is the width of the multipoles bins used when computing the angular power spectra.
I would like to understand why this factor appears. Normally, we can infer the expression of ##\sigma_(C_{\ell})## and get :
##\sigma_(C_{\ell})=\sqrt{\frac{2}{(2 \ell+1)}}\,C_{\ell}##
That is to say, without having the ##\Delta\ell## factor under the root.
In my case, I have only a finite number of multipoles ##\ell## (60 exactly) in a range between 10 and 5000 and 60 corresponding ##C_\ell##. From my tutor, to compute this standard-deviation, I have to take :
##\Delta\ell=(4990/60)##.
But I would like to understand why I have to use this factor when we have a finite number of equidistant multipoles with associated ##C_\ell## values.
For example, my tutor told me that, ideally, we would have a ##C_\ell## for each ##\ell=1..N##, i.e with ##\ell=1,2,3,4,...N## with the formula :
##\sigma(C_{\ell})^2=\frac{2}{(2 \ell+1)}\,C_{\ell}^{2}##
But he mentionned that, like we have only a finite number of equidistant multipoles ##\ell##, we are obliged to use this factor ##\Delta\ell## in our case (equation##(1)##).
My tutor told me it is like an average on the expression with multipole ##\ell##, i.e on the factor ##\sqrt{\dfrac{2}{(2\ell+1)}}##, but I didn't fully understand this meaning.
Could anyone help me to justify the using of this factor ##\Delta\ell## ?
UPDATE : Someone tried quickly to explain why we introduce this factor ##\Delta\ell## inside the square root, but I am still confused about this demonstration.
Here is his reasoning :
For the interval ##b##: ##b=[\ell, \ell+\Delta\ell]##, one has :
##C_{\ell,b}=\dfrac{1}{\Delta\ell}\,\sum_{\ell'=\ell}^{\ell'+\Delta\ell}\,C_{\ell'}##
If one takes the variance, then :
##\text{Var}(C_{\ell,b})=\dfrac{1}{\Delta\ell^2}\,\sum_{\ell'}\text{Var}(C_{\ell'})##
##\text{Var}(C_{\ell,b})=\dfrac{1}{\Delta\ell^2}\,\sum_{\ell'}\dfrac{2}{(2\ell'+1)}\,(C_{\ell'})\quad(2)##
Important step here, one considers the equality (which is actually an approximation) :
##\sum_{\ell'}\dfrac{2}{(2\ell'+1)}\,(C_{\ell'})=\dfrac{2}{(2\ell_{mean}+1)}\,(C_{\ell'_{mean}}^2)\,\Delta\ell\quad(3)##
This way, we have from equation ##(2)## :
##\text{Var}(C_{\ell,b})\simeq \dfrac{1}{\Delta\ell^2}\,\dfrac{2}{(2\ell_{mean}+1)}\,(C_{\ell'_{mean}}^2)\,\Delta\ell##
Finally the expression of the variance for the interval ##b##:
##\text{Var}(C_{\ell,b})\simeq \dfrac{1}{\Delta\ell}\,\dfrac{2}{(2\ell_{mean}+1)}\,(C_{\ell'_{mean}}^2)##
I still didn't understand the step between ##(2)## and ##(3)##.
For me, an average is under the form :
##C_{\ell'_{mean}}=\dfrac{1}{2}\,(C_{\ell'}+C_{\ell'+\Delta\ell})## but I can't see this factor ##\dfrac{1}{2}## in this reasoning.
If someone could explain this critical step between ##(2)## and ##(3)##.