Introduction to GR. ¿Gron or Collier?

In summary, the conversation discusses the speaker's desire to study General Relativity and their search for a beginner-friendly book on the subject. Two options, "Einsteins Theory for the mathematically untrained" by Gron-Naess and "A most incomprehensible thing" by Collier, are mentioned and compared. While both books cover the basics of calculus and required mathematics, Gron's book is recommended for its rigorous approach and inclusion of often omitted steps in calculations. Other suggestions, such as Landau-Lifshitz vol. II and Weinberg's "Gravitation and Cosmology," are also mentioned. However, it is suggested that the speaker should have a solid understanding of calculus and other mathematical concepts before delving
  • #36
Thank you all for your replies.

I think I will use Gron (perhaps supplemented with Collier, for a different view and more examples).
Most of you agree that Gron is a nice introduction to the subject, and opinions from such distinguished forum contributors is really important for me.

Hope to count with your help when I get lost with Gron's explanations (which I am pretty sure it will happen when I get to contravariant and covariant vectors)

Once I master it, maybe I will try with Zee.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
To avoid the confusion right away: There are no contravariant and covariant vectors but only contra and covariant components of vectors with respect to a basis, at least in a Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian manifold.
 
  • #38
I am already having problems with these concepts, you see...
 
  • #39
It seems to me you have the level suited for studying GR out of Schutz's book. May I ask what books you learned physics with? You said you were self-studying. Can you solve problems, or do you have only a theoretical understanding?
If you thoroughly studied the physics subjects that you listed I see no reason not to go straight to Schutz.
 
  • #40
I am telecommunications engineer, now working as a teacher.
In adition to my formal education as an engineer, and focusing in pure physics, I have studied classical mechanics from Kleppner - Kolenkow and Morin's books, and electrodynamics from Griffiths' book. I have also read something from Griffiths' QM book, but I still can not claim to have studied it. Sure I can solve problems, that is what I mean when I say that I have studied a book. That is why it takes me so long to complete a book.
 
  • #41
Did you work through the problems too? If so, I think you are ready to tackle Schutz. His special relativity chapter will be valuable if the only SR you have seen comes from K&K or the likes. What's more, if you find it too difficult, you can always go back to easier books.
 
  • #42
Ok, I will take a look Schutz book as well. I think I saw it at the library.

Tanks for the advice.
 
  • #43
I have checked reviews in amazon for Schutz's book, and self learrners do not seem to be very pleased with it.

I think I will keep on going with Gron.

Thanks.
 
  • #44
almarpa said:
I have checked reviews in amazon for Schutz's book, and self learrners do not seem to be very pleased with it.

I think I will keep on going with Gron.

Thanks.
Yup I had purchased Schutz (especially because of the solution manual) but hated it. I had used Gron, Collier, Foster-Nightingale (the third edition is a really great book), and Susskind GR lectures to get a good overview of the subject before delving into other books.
 
  • #45
I'd be curious if you ever tried Hartle? I saw that Sean Carroll recommended it once as a precursor to his book.

Also, what was it about Schutz that didn't speak to you?
 
  • #46
ibkev said:
I'd be curious if you ever tried Hartle? I saw that Sean Carroll recommended it once as a precursor to his book.

Also, what was it about Schutz that didn't speak to you?
I like Hartle. I can read and understand Schutz now (that I know GR) but it was very confusing for me and boring to read when I started. What had really helped me was simultaneously (when I felt like) using Gron, Collier, Foster-Nightingale, and Susskind lectures together along with this short video. I did have most of the Math Pre-Requisites when I started.

If you have most of the prerequisites, another fantastic book to learn GR from is
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1891389823/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Some solutions for the book are available http://www.physicspages.com/index-physics-relativity/thomas-a-moore-a-general-relativity-workbook/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes ibkev
  • #47
I have heard good things about Hartle, but it is not available at my library. I can not buy a book that I have not reviewed before.
 
Last edited:
  • #48
Yesterday I checked Moore's book on general relativity and I found it really interesting.

Would you say that it is at the same level than Gron, or maybe (as it seemed to me) it is one or two steps more difficult?

If so, would it be a good starting point instead of Gron's?

Regards.
 
  • #49
almarpa said:
Yesterday I checked Moore's book on general relativity and I found it really interesting.

Would you say that it is at the same level than Gron, or maybe (as it seemed to me) it is one or two steps more difficult?

If so, would it be a good starting point instead of Gron's?

Regards.
Hard to compare. I like having multiple books available to be consulted. Moore's book is actually a workbook - he starts with very rudimentary explanation of and then takes you through steps. I believe it could be used as a second book after Gron to make sure concepts are solidified (as long as you can actually go through all the steps and finish the book).
 
  • #50
Just curious, what was your roadmap to learn general relativity?
 
  • #51
almarpa said:
Just curious, what was your roadmap to learn general relativity?
Nothing in particular. I read some books here. Some books there. Watched some videos until I got the general idea. Then I just read different stuff from different books. That's how I always read. Take a bunch of books and read different stuff from them. I cannot follow a roadmap especially since this is for fun.
 
  • #52
Yesterday I stumbled over another great book on GR:

Peter Hoyng, Relativistic Astrophysics and Cosmology, Springer (2006)

The title is a bit misleading, because it is really a very nice introduction into GR, treating the math (differential geometry of pseudo-Riemannian manifolds) boiling it down to the essentials but very well motivated and thoroughly derived. E.g., it gives the best introduction to the Fermi-Walker transport of tetrades and the associated physics like the Thomas precession in SR and the geodetic precession I've ever seen. Without sacrificing understandability and derivations of the mathematical foundations it comes quickly to the physics (Einstein's field equations), the Schwarzschild solution, Oppenheimer-Volkoff (stars), black holes, gravitational waves, and finally FLRW. It's a great introduction enabling one to read more detailed books like Weinberg's on the subject.
 
  • Like
Likes smodak
  • #53
vanhees71 said:
Yesterday I stumbled over another great book on GR:

Peter Hoyng, Relativistic Astrophysics and Cosmology, Springer (2006)

The title is a bit misleading, because it is really a very nice introduction into GR, treating the math (differential geometry of pseudo-Riemannian manifolds) boiling it down to the essentials but very well motivated and thoroughly derived. E.g., it gives the best introduction to the Fermi-Walker transport of tetrades and the associated physics like the Thomas precession in SR and the geodetic precession I've ever seen. Without sacrificing understandability and derivations of the mathematical foundations it comes quickly to the physics (Einstein's field equations), the Schwarzschild solution, Oppenheimer-Volkoff (stars), black holes, gravitational waves, and finally FLRW. It's a great introduction enabling one to read more detailed books like Weinberg's on the subject.
The book looks really good. UGH! Now I will have to get this book :(
 
  • #55
No confusion. I have finally decided to go with Gron.
 
  • #56
smodak said:
Not to confuse the OP more but here is a very good synopsis of some books.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/rel_booklist.html

This list is good, but it is very out-of-date. Examples too recent to be on the list include GR books (in roughly ascending order of level) by

Collier
Gron and Naess
Moore
Hartle
Zee
Hobson, Efstathiou, and Lasenby (who bought me a beer in Banff)
Ryder
Plebanski and Krasinski
Straumann
Gron and Hervik
Carroll
Padmanabhan

some of which have been mentioned in this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes almarpa
  • #57
Great contribution, George!

This is just what I needed to make up my mind.

I am surprised to see Zee up in the list. I thought it was at the same level than Carroll.
 

Similar threads

Relativity Reviews of “Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity”
Replies
3
Views
1K
Relativity Finding a Good Book on GR: Experiences & Resources
Replies
7
Views
2K
Relativity Introduction Math for General Relativity - Engineers
Replies
16
Views
2K
Relativity Math of GR Exercises from Spacetime & Geometry by Sean Carroll
Replies
11
Views
2K
Relativity Advanced Theoretical Physics: a book on SR & GR for Undergrad Students?
Replies
10
Views
3K
Relativity Suggestions for graduate studies in General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
2K
Relativity I want to learn special relativity. More details below
Replies
15
Views
2K
Relativity Special relativity in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian language
Replies
7
Views
2K
Relativity Introduction to general relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
Relativity Seeking advice for mathematics books before GR
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top