MHB Inverse Functions and "Verifying"

AI Thread Summary
The inverse function provided, f^-1(x) = (-x-1)/(3x-2), is verified correctly using substitution, confirming that f(f^-1(x)) = x. The method for verifying f^-1(f(x)) is also accurate, as substituting f(x) into the inverse function yields x. For the second question, the derivation of t = -a*ln(1-(Q/Qo)) is correct, and the calculation for t when Q/Qo = 0.9 results in 4.6 seconds to recharge the battery. Overall, the solutions presented are validated and correct.
ardentmed
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I have a couple more questions about this problem set I've been working on. I'm doubting some of my answers and I'd appreciate some help.

Question:
08b1167bae0c33982682_4.jpg


Alright, I'm having quite a bit of trouble with these. So here it goes:

For the first one, I did the 3-step procedure to finding the inverse: write y=f(x), solve for x and y, then interchange variables. Ultimately, this gave me: f^-1(x) = (-x-1)/(3x-2)

And to verify, I just used substitution since f(f^-1(x)) = x:

(2+3)/(6/1) = (2+3)/(6/1) [Is this even remotely correct? I just substituted the corresponding values.]

As for verifying "f^-1 (f(x)) = x, I have no idea how to go about doing this. Do I just substituted the original function in the left hand side into the inverse function?

As for the second question, for 2a, I got t= -a*ln(1-(Q/Qo)) by switching variables to get the inverse and solving for t.

As for question 2b, I assumed that Q/Qo = 0.9 for 90%. Therefore, since a=2, I could substitute that value into the function, giving me:

t= -2ln(1-0.9)
t= 4.6 seconds needed to recharge the battery to 90%.

Any help is much appreciated.

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ardentmed said:
Hey guys,

I have a couple more questions about this problem set I've been working on. I'm doubting some of my answers and I'd appreciate some help.

Question:Alright, I'm having quite a bit of trouble with these. So here it goes:

For the first one, I did the 3-step procedure to finding the inverse: write y=f(x), solve for x and y, then interchange variables. Ultimately, this gave me: f^-1(x) = (-x-1)/(3x-2)

And to verify, I just used substitution since f(f^-1(x)) = x:

(2+3)/(6/1) = (2+3)/(6/1) [Is this even remotely correct? I just substituted the corresponding values.]

As for verifying "f^-1 (f(x)) = x, I have no idea how to go about doing this. Do I just substituted the original function in the left hand side into the inverse function?

As for the second question, for 2a, I got t= -a*ln(1-(Q/Qo)) by switching variables to get the inverse and solving for t.

As for question 2b, I assumed that Q/Qo = 0.9 for 90%. Therefore, since a=2, I could substitute that value into the function, giving me:

t= -2ln(1-0.9)
t= 4.6 seconds needed to recharge the battery to 90%.

Any help is much appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

The inverse function is correct!

To verify that $f(f^{-1}(x)) = x$ :

$$f(f^{-1}(x))=f \left ( \frac{-x-1}{3x-2} \right )=\frac{2 \left (\frac{-x-1}{3x-2} \right )-1}{3\left (\frac{-x-1}{3x-2} \right )+1}=\frac{\frac{-2x-2-3x+2}{3x-2}}{\frac{-3x-3+3x-2}{3x-2}}=\frac{\frac{-5x}{3x-2}}{\frac{-5}{3x-2}}=\frac{-5x}{-5}=x$$

To verify that $f^{-1} (f(x)) = x$ :

$$f^{-1} (f(x))=f^{-1} \left ( \frac{2x-1}{3x+1} \right )=\frac{-\left ( \frac{2x-1}{3x+1} \right )-1}{3\left ( \frac{2x-1}{3x+1} \right )-2}=\frac{\frac{-2x+1-3x-1}{3x+1}}{\frac{6x-3-6x-2}{3x+1}}=\frac{-5x}{-5}=x$$As for the second exercise:

$$Q(t)=Q_0 \left (1-e^{-\frac{t}{a}} \right ) \Rightarrow \frac{Q(t)}{Q_0}=1-e^{-\frac{t}{a}} \Rightarrow e^{-\frac{t}{a}}=1-\frac{Q(t)}{Q_0} \Rightarrow -\frac{t}{a}=\ln{ \left | 1-\frac{Q(t)}{Q_0} \right |} \\ \Rightarrow t=-a \cdot \ln{ \left | 1-\frac{Q(t)}{Q_0} \right |}$$

Your solution for the question $2b$ seems correct to me!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top