Inverse Laplace Transform (Proof?)

In summary, the inverse Laplace Transform is a mathematical operation that allows us to find the original function from its Laplace transform. It is given by the formula \mathcal{L}^{-1} \{F(s)\} = f(t) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\lim_{T\to\infty}\int_{\gamma-iT}^{\gamma+iT}e^{st}F(s)\,ds, and surprisingly, it does not depend on the value of \gamma. The proof for this can be found in most standard Laplace transform textbooks, such as the one in Schaum's Outline Series. An interesting aspect of the Inverse Laplace Transform is the Post's inversion
  • #1
John Creighto
495
2
According go Wikipedia the inverse Laplace Transform is given by:

[tex]\mathcal{L}^{-1} \{F(s)\} = f(t) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\lim_{T\to\infty}\int_{\gamma-iT}^{\gamma+iT}e^{st}F(s)\,ds,[/tex]

How do you probe this? I'm surprised that it doesn't depend on the value of [tex]\gama[/tex]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_Laplace_transform
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think the proof can be found in most standard Laplace transform textbook. I have seen one in Schaum's Outline Series in Laplace Transform.

What is interesting about the Inverse Laplace Transform is the Post's inversion formula available at Wikipedia link. This inversion formula doesn't involve singularities but we need to compute derivatives of higher order.

Do anyone know any efficient method to compute higher order derivative f(k)(x) ?
 

FAQ: Inverse Laplace Transform (Proof?)

What is the Inverse Laplace Transform?

The Inverse Laplace Transform is a mathematical operation that takes a function in the complex frequency domain and converts it into a function in the time domain.

What is the proof for the Inverse Laplace Transform?

The proof for the Inverse Laplace Transform involves using the Cauchy integral formula, contour integration, and the residue theorem to evaluate the inverse Laplace integral.

How is the Inverse Laplace Transform used in science?

The Inverse Laplace Transform is used in a variety of scientific fields, including engineering, physics, and mathematics, to analyze and solve differential equations and systems of equations.

What are the assumptions made in the proof of the Inverse Laplace Transform?

The proof of the Inverse Laplace Transform assumes that the function being transformed is piecewise continuous and of exponential order, and that it has a finite number of singularities in the complex plane.

Are there any limitations to the Inverse Laplace Transform?

While the Inverse Laplace Transform is a powerful mathematical tool, it does have limitations. It cannot be used to solve all types of differential equations, and it may not always yield a unique solution.

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top