Inverse linear transformation (think I got it, but don't have answer to compare)

In summary, T is a linear transformation from P1 to P1 that is one-to-one and therefore invertible. Its inverse, T-1, is defined as T-1(a+bx)=b+(a-b)x.
  • #1
phyzmatix
313
0

Homework Statement



Define [tex]T:P_1 \rightarrow P_1[/tex] by T(a+bx)=(a-b)+ax. Check as to whether T has an inverse or not and if it has, find [tex]T^{-1}[/tex]

Homework Equations



[tex]T^{-1}(T(v))=v[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



The range of T is P1, so T is one-to-one. The inverse of T is therefore

[tex]T^{-1}((a-b)+ax)=(a+bx)[/tex]

Is my reasoning sound?

Thanks for the help!
phyz
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, T is a linear transformation from P1 to P1, so if it is injective or surjective it is invertible. Should you show T is one-to-one using the definition or by showing null(T)={0}?

Your T-1 needs to be actually defined. As defined, T's range is P2. So let c+dx+ex2 be in P2. Define T-1:P2→P1 by T-1(c+dx+ex2)=d+(d-c)x. Now check that T-1 is actually the inverse of T by showing T-1(T(a+bx))=a+bx.
 
  • #3
n!kofeyn said:
Yes, T is a linear transformation from P1 to P1, so if it is injective or surjective it is invertible. Should you show T is one-to-one using the definition or by showing null(T)={0}?

Your T-1 needs to be actually defined. As defined, T's range is P2. So let c+dx+ex2 be in P2. Define T-1:P2→P1 by T-1(c+dx+ex2)=d+(d-c)x. Now check that T-1 is actually the inverse of T by showing T-1(T(a+bx))=a+bx.

Hi there...sorry, but I made a typo :redface:

Should be [tex]T:P_1 \rightarrow P_1[/tex] not [tex]T:P_1 \rightarrow P_2[/tex]. Fixed it now though. They don't say how you should determine whether T has an inverse or not.
 
  • #4
Oh okay, no problem. That makes more sense, as that confused me a little bit. Then just remove the ex2 from everywhere it appears above.

Read http://books.google.com/books?id=BNsOE3Gp_hEC&lpg=PP1&dq=sheldon axler linear algebra&pg=PA53" for invertibility of linear maps. Look at Theorem 3.21. To show T is invertible, all you need to do is show that it is injective or onto since it is a linear map from P1 to P1. I would recommend showing that if T(a+bx)=T(c+dx), then a+bx=c+dx to show it is one-to-one. Then just define the inverse of T as above, and you're done.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Thanks for that! Have a great weekend! :smile:
 
  • #6
Haha. No problem, and the same to you!
 

FAQ: Inverse linear transformation (think I got it, but don't have answer to compare)

What is an inverse linear transformation?

An inverse linear transformation is a mathematical operation that reverses the effects of a linear transformation. It essentially undoes the original transformation, allowing you to go back to the original values.

How do you calculate the inverse of a linear transformation?

To calculate the inverse of a linear transformation, you need to find the inverse matrix. This can be done by using the Gauss-Jordan elimination method or by using the inverse matrix formula. Once you have the inverse matrix, you can apply it to the original transformation to get back to the original values.

What is the purpose of an inverse linear transformation?

The purpose of an inverse linear transformation is to help solve problems that involve transformation of data. It allows you to go back to the original values and make comparisons or calculations that were not possible with the transformed data.

What is the difference between an inverse linear transformation and a linear transformation?

The main difference between an inverse linear transformation and a linear transformation is that an inverse transformation undoes the original transformation, while a linear transformation changes the original values into new ones based on a set of equations or rules.

Can any linear transformation have an inverse?

No, not all linear transformations have an inverse. For a linear transformation to have an inverse, it must be a one-to-one transformation, meaning that each input has a unique output. If the transformation is not one-to-one, it cannot be reversed and therefore does not have an inverse.

Similar threads

Back
Top