IQ 195 Genius Challenges the Many Worlds Interpretation

In summary, Christopher Langan is a self-promoting quack who is trying to sell a metaphysical model of the universe that has little to no explanatory power. His claim of being the smartest man in America is laughable, and his video on YouTube is full of pseudoscience and gibberish.
  • #1
bennington
25
0
Earlier today, I saw a show that had the smartest man in America with an IQ of 195 who is working on a Cognitive - Theoretic Model of the Universe. He attacks the MWI with:

The Many Worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, in claiming to circumvent the problem of quantum mechanical wave function collapse, in effect claims to circumvent the problem of split consciousness as well. However, since MW is itself necessarily formulated in terms of two-valued logic, the problem regresses to that of how the “hyperuniverse” associated with MW itself “collapsed” out of the sea of all potential “meta-realities”. On this score, MW has little insight to offer on its own behalf. MW thus lacks justificative self-containment and is therefore no basis for a fundamental theory of reality. In any case, since the theory we are describing in this paper is designed to address reality in its most basic form, and thus to address all conceivable realities as its possible instantiations, it supersedes any explanation afforded by MW alone.

What do Many-Worlders think about a statement such as this coming from an intelligent person?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think that this proves the limitations of IQ tests.
 
  • Like
Likes Derek Potter
  • #3
bennington said:
Earlier today, I saw a show that had the smartest man in America
What Show? What Man?
 
  • #4
RandallB said:
What Show? What Man?
Christopher Langan. Apparently he was on the NBC gameshow "1 vs. 100". His "cognitive-theoretic" model seems to be nebulous metaphysics--see here for a description. And his objection to the many-worlds interpretation above is likewise metaphysical--he's saying it doesn't explain where the laws themselves come from (neither does any other theory of physics).
 
  • Like
Likes Derek Potter
  • #5
I very much doubt that someone with a title "the smartest man in ..." is anywhere near as smart as he claims to be.
 
  • #6
From: http://www.testcafe.com/iqtest/

"Congratulations!
Your general IQ score is 164.

A person whose IQ score falls in the range of 161 and above is considered to be a "genius".
An IQ is a composite of your scores across 12 distinct aspects of intelligence. Each person has a unique intellectual make-up, with strengths and weaknesses that affect their methods of understanding, recognition, communication and association. Using a carefully cross-reference scoring scheme, TestCafe is able to accumulate a profound quantity of information about your natural intellectual abilities."

So I guess I'm not as smart as Chris Langan. Oh well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
peter0302 said:
From: http://www.testcafe.com/iqtest/

"Congratulations!
Your general IQ score is 164.

A person whose IQ score falls in the range of 161 and above is considered to be a "genius".
An IQ is a composite of your scores across 12 distinct aspects of intelligence. Each person has a unique intellectual make-up, with strengths and weaknesses that affect their methods of understanding, recognition, communication and association. Using a carefully cross-reference scoring scheme, TestCafe is able to accumulate a profound quantity of information about your natural intellectual abilities."

So I guess I'm not as smart as Chris Langan. Oh well.

Don't fret, I'm not either. You know, its funny how people with nongenius IQs end up making all of the discoveries that benefit mankind, but high IQ people spend their time solving puzzles and trying to create funding on high IQ societies like his own. See his video on YouTube to see crackpottery in action.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related to IQ 195 Genius Challenges the Many Worlds Interpretation

1. What is the "Many Worlds Interpretation"?

The Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) is a theory in quantum mechanics that suggests that every possible outcome of a quantum event actually occurs in a separate parallel universe. This theory was first proposed by physicist Hugh Everett III in 1957.

2. How does IQ 195 challenge the Many Worlds Interpretation?

IQ 195 is a measure of intelligence that is considered to be extremely high, with the average IQ being around 100. The idea of an incredibly intelligent individual questioning and challenging a complex theory like MWI can lead to new perspectives and ideas that may challenge or expand upon the existing theory.

3. What are the potential implications of challenging the Many Worlds Interpretation?

If IQ 195 is able to provide evidence or insights that challenge the MWI, it could potentially lead to a better understanding of quantum mechanics and the nature of reality. It could also open up new avenues for research and further advancements in the field.

4. Is IQ 195 considered to be a genius level of intelligence?

Yes, IQ 195 would be considered to be in the genius range of intelligence. It is important to note, however, that IQ is not the only measure of intelligence and there are many different types of intelligence that contribute to overall cognitive abilities.

5. How can an individual with an IQ of 195 contribute to the study of the Many Worlds Interpretation?

An individual with such a high level of intelligence can bring unique perspectives and insights to any field of study, including the MWI. They may be able to approach the theory from a different angle, ask new questions, and provide valuable contributions to the ongoing research and discussion surrounding the MWI.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
744
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
5
Replies
174
Views
10K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
4
Replies
120
Views
10K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
0
Views
229
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
21
Views
3K
Back
Top