MHB Is a^2 - 6a + 12 Irreducible Over the Integers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the polynomial a^2 - 6a + 12, which is stated to be irreducible over the integers, meaning it cannot be factored into polynomials with integer coefficients. The expression is derived from the factorization of 8 + (a - 2)^3. Participants seek clarification on the author's claim and request additional examples of irreducible polynomials. The conversation emphasizes understanding irreducibility in the context of polynomial factorization. Overall, the focus is on the properties of the polynomial and the concept of irreducibility in algebra.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
In the textbook, the author showed that 8 + (a - 2)^3 factors out to be a(a^2 - 6a + 12).

The author goes on to say "...the expression a^2 - 6a + 12 is irreducible over the integers."

What does the author means by the statement?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It simply means that the polynomial $a^2-6a+12$ cannot be factored into the product of two polynomials with coefficients that are integers. :D
 
Can you provide me with a few more irreducible examples?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top