- #1
Saladsamurai
- 3,020
- 7
Okay then. I just read the section of Axler on subspaces. It says that if U is a subset of V, then to check that U is a subspace of V we need only check that U satisfies the following:
additive identity
[tex]0\in U[/tex]
closed under addition
[tex]u,v\in U\text{ implies }u+v\,\in\,U[/tex]
closed under scalar multiplication
[tex]a\in\mathbf{F}\text{ and }u\in U\text{ implies }au\in U[/tex]
Now I am supposed to use these axioms to verify that for [itex]b\in\mathbf{F}[/itex], then
[tex]{(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4)\in\mathbf{F}^4:x_3=5x_4+b}[/tex]
is a subspace of F4 iff b=0.
I am not exactly sure how to actually apply those 3 axioms to this problem?
How does one test that [itex]u,v\in U\text{ implies }u+v\,\in\,U[/itex]?
Should I start with something like:
(x1,x2,x3,x4)+(y1,y2,y3,y4)=(x1+y1,x2+y2,5x4+b+5y4+b,x4+y4) ?
additive identity
[tex]0\in U[/tex]
closed under addition
[tex]u,v\in U\text{ implies }u+v\,\in\,U[/tex]
closed under scalar multiplication
[tex]a\in\mathbf{F}\text{ and }u\in U\text{ implies }au\in U[/tex]
Now I am supposed to use these axioms to verify that for [itex]b\in\mathbf{F}[/itex], then
[tex]{(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4)\in\mathbf{F}^4:x_3=5x_4+b}[/tex]
is a subspace of F4 iff b=0.
I am not exactly sure how to actually apply those 3 axioms to this problem?
How does one test that [itex]u,v\in U\text{ implies }u+v\,\in\,U[/itex]?
Should I start with something like:
(x1,x2,x3,x4)+(y1,y2,y3,y4)=(x1+y1,x2+y2,5x4+b+5y4+b,x4+y4) ?
Last edited: