Is a Moon Trip More Valuable Than a Mars Mission?

  • Thread starter k_squared
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Mars Moon
In summary, the conversation discusses the value of space exploration and whether it is better to prioritize robotic exploration or human exploration. There is a disagreement about the purpose of exploration and which celestial body, the moon or Mars, would be a better option for human colonization. Some argue that humans are necessary for experiencing and appreciating the unknown, while others argue that robots can fulfill this role. Ultimately, it is suggested that the first humans to land on Mars will likely be test pilots. The conversation also mentions famous astronauts and pilots who have contributed to space exploration.
  • #1
k_squared
64
0
Let's face it: it would be a lot cheaper to go to the moon.

How does the value of going there compare to the value of going to mars?

Anyone pitch in...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Of course the moon is cheaper this time of year, but Mars is the better vacation spot, hands down!

(Honestly: red sand beaches, vs. grey sand beaches. Is there even a debate)
 
  • #3
That's a tough question for me. Although I'm a Trekker, and love the idea of that impossible future, I have to go along with Ivan's and Turbo's assertion that robotic exploration is the logical way to go.
As an immediately attainable goal, it would be fairly easy to set up a lunar colony. For the long-term, though, Mars would be better suited to the matter of human population expansion. With the exception of scientific knowledge, which is easily obtainable by robots, the only reason for establishing off-world habitats is that Earth can no longer sustain the billions of people who inhabit it.
I love my cozy little house in my little town, but if there was a chance for me to move to a lunar or L5 colony, or to Mars, I would be gone like a bullet.
 
  • #4
Danger said:
Although I'm a Trekker, and love the idea of that impossible future, I have to go along with Ivan's and Turbo's assertion that robotic exploration is the logical way to go.

DISAGREE! One of the purposes of exploration is to experience the unexperienced in a way that only a human can understand and appreciate. I feel very strongly about that. Robots are so good for so many things, but to put a person on the Moon or Mars is much more meaningful to the species as a whole. A robot will never know to turn it's head to see a sunrise, or to be curious about a particular mote of dust.

Anyway! Back to the OP!

Moon. Let's do it. We're not done there. Cernan wanted us back there, and we owe him. NASA needs to play "follow-the-leader" again. They showed us how to make orbital launches look like bicycle riding. Now they hand off orbital operations to the private sector and show us how to make Moon landings look simple. When the private sector is opening hotels on the Moon, then let's hit up Mars.
 
  • #5
FlexGunship said:
DISAGREE! One of the purposes of exploration is to experience the unexperienced in a way that only a human can understand and appreciate.

As strange as this might sound, I agree with your disagreement. That is why I specified that the Trek future is an impossible one, since it relies upon faster than light travel and even faster communications. (And aliens who look more human than I do, but that's beside the point.)
The reasons that I suggested Mars as a better long-term situation are based upon a close-to-Earth gravity and the possibility of living outdoors without serious environmental suits. An L5 colony can simulate gravity by spinning, but a lunar one can't.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
FlexGunship said:
One of the purposes of exploration is to experience the unexperienced in a way that only a human can understand and appreciate.
My bet is though that the first men on Mars are going to be test pilots rather than poets though
 
  • #7
NobodySpecial said:
My bet is though that the first men on Mars are going to be test pilots rather than poets though

You deny the qualities of introspection and reflection to test pilots? I think Cernan, Young, Armstrong, Shepard, Collins and Lovell (to name a few) would disagree.
 
  • #8
FlexGunship said:
You deny the qualities of introspection and reflection to test pilots? I think Cernan, Young, Armstrong, Shepard, Collins and Lovell (to name a few) would disagree.

But Jodie Foster http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118884/quotes" .

"They should have sent a poet..."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
FlexGunship said:
You deny the qualities of introspection and reflection to test pilots? I think Cernan, Young, Armstrong, Shepard, Collins and Lovell (to name a few) would disagree.

And leave us not forget Chuck Yeager. He was a bullet-head whose political stance I mostly disagreed with, but he was also a dreamer and one of the best pilots who ever lived. His autobiography is one of my most prized possessions.
 

FAQ: Is a Moon Trip More Valuable Than a Mars Mission?

What are the main differences between visiting the Moon and visiting Mars?

Visiting the Moon and visiting Mars are two vastly different experiences. While the Moon is much closer to Earth, Mars is significantly farther away. Additionally, the Moon has no atmosphere and very little gravity, whereas Mars has a thin atmosphere and about 40% of Earth's gravity. The landscapes on both bodies are also very different, with the Moon being mostly rocky and barren, and Mars having diverse terrain with mountains, valleys, and even polar ice caps.

How long does it take to travel to the Moon and Mars?

The time it takes to travel to the Moon and Mars varies depending on the spacecraft and trajectory used. On average, it takes about 3 days to travel to the Moon, while it takes 6-9 months to travel to Mars. However, with advancements in technology, NASA is working towards reducing the travel time to Mars to about 3-4 months.

What are the challenges of visiting the Moon compared to visiting Mars?

Visiting the Moon and Mars both present unique challenges. The main challenge of visiting the Moon is the lack of resources and atmosphere, which makes it difficult for humans to live and work there for extended periods of time. On the other hand, the main challenge of visiting Mars is the long travel time, harsh environment, and need for self-sufficiency due to the distance from Earth.

Are there any similarities between visiting the Moon and visiting Mars?

Although there are many differences between visiting the Moon and Mars, there are also some similarities. Both bodies have a day/night cycle, with the Moon having a 29-day long day/night cycle and Mars having a 24.5-hour long day/night cycle. Additionally, both the Moon and Mars have been explored by robotic spacecraft and have potential for future human exploration.

How have advancements in technology impacted our ability to visit the Moon and Mars?

Advancements in technology have greatly impacted our ability to visit the Moon and Mars. The development of more advanced and efficient spacecraft has made it possible to travel farther and faster, reducing the travel time to Mars. The use of robotic missions has also provided valuable information about these bodies, helping us better understand the challenges and requirements for human missions. Furthermore, advancements in life support systems and sustainability technologies have made it more feasible for humans to live and work on these bodies for extended periods of time.

Similar threads

Back
Top