Is Absolute Convergence Required for Evaluating Sums over Rational Numbers?

Click For Summary
Absolute convergence is essential for evaluating sums over rational numbers, as rearrangements of a series converge to the same value only under this condition. The discussion explores the possibility of evaluating sums of the form ∑_q f(q) where q is expressed as m/n, with m and n as positive integers. It is noted that the sum may depend on the ordering of rational numbers, which are countable. Additionally, using the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, one can consider sums over primes or prime powers, such as ∑_{m=-∞}^{∞}∑_{p}f(p^{m}). Ultimately, the ability to reproduce every positive rational through suitable products of primes allows for further exploration of invariant-under-dilation formulas.
zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
it is possible to evaluate sums over the set of Rational

so \sum_{q} f(q) with q= \frac{m}{n} and m and n are POSITIVE integers different from 0 ??

in any case for a suitable function is possible to evaluate

\sum_{q} f(qx) with f(0)=0 ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think so, as the rationals are countable.
 
However, in some cases the sum will depend on the ordering of the rational numbers given by the one-to-one correspondence with the positive integers.
 
um.. if i use the fundamental theorem of the arithmetic to express m and n as a product of primes could i write or consider at least series over prime or prime powers ? i mean

\sum_{m=-\infty}^{\infty}\sum_{p}f(p^{m})

in both case this sum is over prime and prime powers is this more or less correct ??

using suitable products of primes we can reproduce every positive rational can't we ?

so we can study 'invariant-under-dilation' formulae as follows

\sum_{m=-\infty}^{\infty}\sum_{p}f(xp^{m})
 
HallsofIvy is correct: all rearrangements of a series converge to the same value if and only if the series is absolutely convergent. So that can affect the sum.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
519
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K